you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Authentic science is never free from potentially corrupted humans and power.

"Leaders" may promote scientism, outright lie, be misinformed, ignorant, or downright evil. They may also pull levers to censor, hard, soft, or otherwise.

Only an dogmatic idiot believes everything they're told (ie. corrupt scientism) without critically thinking it over first.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Really? Assessing accuracy in scientific research isn't so difficult. The irony is that authritarian assholes developed the criticisms you mentioned to make you believe that scientists are oppressing you. Consider the sources for this nonsense.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

It is indeed difficult if the powers that be whom you work for censor accurate, authentic, open science that's out of their control.

You simply can't admit that the ruling class has influence over science, like any other aspect of life under their full spectrum dominance.

You can't even admit that social engineering exists.

"The irony is that authritarian [sic] assholes developed the criticisms you mentioned to make you believe that scientists are oppressing you. Consider the sources for this nonsense."

Teach me your wisdom. Who are these authoritarian assholes you speak of? Which criticisms? What sources? What nonsense.

Scientists are NOT oppressing us - however, the corrupt corporatocracy and their minions are trying to oppress us. Sure some are stupid sheeple, but obviously they're failing to oppress MANY of us. They'd need better bullshit narratives and much better shills than you to be successful on this front. On other fronts, like their engineered looming global food crises, they may murder more than a fuck tonne.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can agree with the points you mention about social engineering and the influence of the 1%, though only on a case-by-case basis. Regarding COVID19, my main concern is that there are reliable methods in place to stop the spread of the virus. Yes, there are associated problems by the 1% and social engineering, but the propaganda and lies spread by babylonbee.com are also part of their own social engineering and voter manipulation approaches. Seems we may disagree on who is involved in the influencing and social engineering approaches against the science regarding COVID19.