China Develops New More Protective Anal Mask | The Babylon Bee

submitted by christnmusicreleases from (babylonbee.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

And this is not a good argument for not wearing masks - and thus supporting the spread of COVID19.

...by not wearing a mask.

You're clearly confused.

According to the CDC fairytale Covid is the name used for the symptoms of the fake virus that they haven't isolated...

Stopping the spread of symptoms with a face mask is laughable, and stupid.

It's obvious that you graduated at the bottom of your class at the shill academy.

FAIL!

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's also worth pointing to all the documentation from the "authorities" that state masks are moot.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

No need to be so defensive and hostile, Todd. The science regarding masks is not arguable.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The science regarding masks is not arguable.

Not by you anyway.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Or by you

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Or by you

Classic bot response

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

sick burn...

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Yet you're arguing - despite the officials stating that masks are moot.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No they're not saying that, and that's not how to use moot in a sentence.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That is how I use moot as others do. It can mean debatable, in question, inconsequential, or irrelevant. There are also other historical meanings.

My off the cuff definitions above are proven correct. I can't believe I let you make me doubt for a moment. You are indeed a timesuck and a dumbass, in short: suck ass.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moot

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=moot

"Moot refers to a subject for academic argument."

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I refer to usage, not definition. You said:

masks are moot

Moot in this case is used as a noun, which would not work in this context.

In order to use moot as an adjective, it should come before a noun or argument

This is also not the way it would be used as a verb.

A discussion or process can be mooted or also moot, but not an object.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Masks are moot = the topic of masks are debatable OR using masks are not relevant to dealing with the scamdemic.

Moot worked because it covered BOTH meanings and was shorter. You are indeed a timesuck. No more for you today.