"Research"

submitted by FediNetizen from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You literally just contradicted yourself.

Otherwise, the more powerful group (oligarchy &c) will tell you what is and what is not 'science'.

That is exactly what IS happening and you are the fool enforcing it by denying unapproved science. It doesn't matter who does the science as long as it follows the scientific method and is sound in its execution.

You literally made the opposite claim, that it is not science, not because the scientific method wasn't followed, but because it wasn't done by oligarchy approved scientists.

As of right now no study has been provided, either for or against the correlation hypothesis. But I suspect even if one is provided you will deny it anyway. Facts be damned.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, ReeferMadness, it's very simple:

1) There is science, based on math and facts and a rigorous approach to the scientific method

2) There are comments like yours that question obvious facts

Why do you have to complicate the issue?

[–]ReeferMadness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

1) please point out where the science that you are attacking is not based on math, facts, or a rigorous approach.

2) "obvious facts" is not a thing. Just because you are sure of something doesn't make it a fact.

I honestly don't think you are capable of understanding the arguments. If you want your friend to stop sending you "conspiracy stuff" just tell her you don't give pearls to a swine. She will understand.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I honestly don't think you are capable of understanding the arguments.

That's rich, coming from you, ReeferMadness