you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Eventually you might realize that you know what you want to say, but cannot communicate it appropriately to others. You might not learn this on Saidit. Your either/or argument still does not work. For example, one does not have to be on Gretta's level, or one would be an anti-Science nut. That's not necessarily what's happening at Saidit. Instead, there there are emotional users pushing their agendas and beliefs, much of which they learned on TheDonald, or Breitbart. Yes, this polarizes the discussion, but not in the manner that you suggest. For example, I see no "Gretta level" users on Saidit.

[–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For example, one does not have to be on Gretta's level, or one would be an anti-Science nut.

My point, idiot.

Unfortunately, neckbeards like you act as though this is the case. You immediately chimed in to say not believing "SCIENCE!" is tantamount to saying 2 + 2 isn't 4.

You're the exact sort of dimwit I'm talking about, and you just proved this over and over.

Nobody else here needed this explained to them so thoroughly.

You're not pro science, in fact, you've demonstrated you don't know what it is. You're pro "SCIENCE!". In other words, you blindly believe what somebody in a suit on the television tells you, while confusing that for science.

OK - where is the 'grey' area that proves SCIENCE is wrong? Consider the black and white argument for math:

2+2 = 4

Unless of course you want to consider the nuanced, grey, non-black and white argument about math,

This was your knee-jerk response. Demonstrating my point that: if you're not on greta's level, you must be anti "SCIENCE!". As well demonstrating you think science and math are the same thing.