White House cautiously opens the door to study blocking sun's rays to slow global warming

submitted by Drewski from eenews.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]rrzibot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

To your point it is a complex subject. Do you think people should be educated on the subject, it's complexity, dangers, details and be provided with data and evidences of how dangerous and unpredictable these methods for limiting the solar radiatios are? Because the alternative is to have ignorant people that think they can blocks the sun with a let's say... an umbrella.

[–]StillLessons 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is why censorship is bar-none the greatest evil in history. Censorship is the prevention of having complex discussions. There's a reason the founders put the first amendment first. How can we educate people when the free speech required for such education does not exist? What I have written above would be disallowed from NYT, NPR, the alphabets, etc as climate disinformation (the modern term for heresy). So instead we rattle around in the backwaters like this site that remain small enough that the censors focus only limited effort in shutting us down.

[–]rrzibot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are making a good point. Help me understand what do you think about my question?