use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
It's true there is no global warming
submitted 1 year ago by weavilsatemyface from i.imgur.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
Check the links in the sub /s/ClimateSkeptics It is full of verifiable examples where you can see that the climate is not getting hotter, but the news is becoming more and more fake.
You can also check this article that goes into the different narrative errors: Article link
[–]weavilsatemyface[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (0 children)
You can also check this article that goes into the different narrative errors:
I got one item in and that's all I needed to see to know that they are not having a good faith debate, but spreading misinformation and false doubt. I mean, seriously, they're pointing at long term cycles that take anything up to 400,000 years to act, and trying to blame them for changes that are occurring over a period of decades and years. They must think their readership is dumber than people that think that lesbians have dicks to try that one.
"My god, it's hot in here, can I turn the heat down? You've got the thermostat set to 100°F. no wonder the furnace is running full bore!"
"Don't be stupid, its not hot because the furnance is on maximum. Its hot because summer is coming, it's only six months away! You're a mad conspiracy theorist if you think running the furnace on full is why the house is hot!!!"
Quoting from the article: "Yes, the climate scientists ignore the sun." -- this is a lie, and an easily disproved one. You have to be willfully ignorant to fall for this. It took literally one google search "IPCC influence of sun" to disprove the lie:
No, they don't ignore the sun. Nor do they ignore clouds, or volcanoes, or the urban heat island effect, or the difference between bare earth and trees, or the influence of dust and particulate pollution. The only possible way you can think that they do is by very, very carefully avoiding reading or listening to anything by climate scientists.
Climate denialists are like the Big Pharma shills who carefully ignore all the reports in VAERS so they can say that there are no vaccine side-effects. And like Big Pharma, it's all about protecting their profits.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]weavilsatemyface[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)