I don't think anyone without serious psychology and neuroscience knowledge would be able to correctly determine an emotion's cause.

And that is why we must piece together the narrative. Treat every source as it comes in as its own source. We must not twist the injected narratives as evidence of something, rather we carefully investigate all sources as their own. Keep in mind, if in fact what is being conducted is a psychological operation, then we must UNDERSTAND, the use of Perception Management in psychological operations. Why? Because if we were not to, we might go on a trail that leads us to more confusion and conflict, which is exactly what these injected, ambiguous, and especially conflicting narratives and alternative government approved theories entail.

As for the Duping Delight, one either sees it or doesn't. If an unprecedented amount of witnesses and alleged victims are displaying duping delight we must call into question their behavior but we should NOT make it the focal center point in the investigation. Simply, display this behavior for all to see and be done with it.

Instead, we should investogate who these people are, which the media and government have done a wonderful job of hiding the alleged particpants information in sealed police reports and mugshots, or simply a name change/alias, making it quite hard to research VicSims that do not exist in the context of a real person.