all 8 comments

[–]wizzwizz4 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is just ridiculous.

Let's assume, for a moment, that vaccines significantly increase the risk of autism and ovary damage. Surely it's more plausible to believe that there's a genetic selective vulnerability to Vaccine Evilness™ than that there's a big conspiracy to selectively poison vaccines based on profiling…

And what counts as "white" and "black" anyway? (I'd say the same about "males" and "females" but I doubt there's enough data about that.)

[–]happysmash27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sex tends to roughly follow a binary, even though there are many, many exceptions, but race is very obviously a human concept since there is much too much mixing for any of the so-called "races" to truly be separate.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which is why it's surprising that anything at all is correlated with race. How much of that is social, cultural, genetic?

[–]Mnemonic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

So is it a hypothetical question followed another hypothetical question?

Any proof for either statement?

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This theory fails to address the massive damage done to young females of all races via HPV vax.