you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alduin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I said it's no more credible than a pure guess. Which is to say, not credible. I don't mean to sound insulting. But when you see sources like the one you provided, you should expect misinformation, not truth. If someone is trying to intentionally decieve you, then you are just as likely to arrive at the truth with a pure guess as to listen to them.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I suppose I don't actually care how he died, nor do I expect most others to care the manner of his death.

There is ample evidence that he died well before the younger, shorter, fatter, fake Bin Laden posted any videos.

Let's suppose he died in 2001 of say a heart attack, or cancer, or stroke, etc. It doesn't change the actual history in any significant way. Had he been captured and killed, maybe. But he wasn't, cause he want involved in 9/11. These are second or third order details that will always be speculated about in the West.

The fact that he died in 2001 is accepted by reasonably informed parties. Multiple credible foreign figures supported this fact.

The fact that someone created a fake Bin Laden, and that the real bin Laden never contested these faked messages lends additional credibility to his 2001 demise.

It's far from a guess.