you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

How many more studies before this is allowed to be common knowledge on the MSM? Or will they never admit it and will just keep pretending even as the research becomes more and more robust?

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's just that Big Pharma has a propaganda network backed by the CIA and it can always ghost-write studies and fake data and demonize the ones who are honest.

There also isn't a medium that reaches a lot of people that can rival the network of the Intelligence groups, so Big Pharma can always whitewash itself as long as it has resources. The only way to create a meaningful opposition is to create alternate sites and "character assassinate" the medical industry for good. I'm sure it can be done with enough records.

[–]Insider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's just that Big Pharma has a propaganda network backed by the CIA and it can always ghost-write studies and fake data and demonize the ones who are honest.

Academia is so vast that you can find countering opinions among them. It's more so the media that will promote the CIA-backed studies and higher impact journals will also get more attention among the scientific community.

Finding nano-thermitic material among the 9/11 debris was conducted by scientists in Denmark, for example. Studies that show the mRNA vaccine may not be entirely safe is also done by scientists. It's just that the media's not promoting these studies.

The only way to create a meaningful opposition is to create alternate sites and "character assassinate" the medical industry for good.

The only way you can have meaningful opposition is through truthers and opposing opinions in the medical industry. Most every day folk just aren't knowledgeable enough or intelligent enough.

You think viruses aren't real for example. In order to prove a claim like that, you need to outline the hundreds of lines of evidence and debunk each one. There are millions of scientists world wide who work based on these lines of evidence. There are layers of evidence and logic that build on top of each other, which wouldn't work if there was a crack in the fundamental theory.

The deep state doesn't control millions of scientists around the world. Not to mention, numerous studies have been exposed as fraudulent by other scientists who consistently couldn't get the same results as the original studies. If viruses were fake, the entire field would have crumbled much earlier.