you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

His writing is very different from what was published under the name of Shakespeare, that's why many reject him as the author. Edward de Vere is a more likely candidate. But Bacon does seem to be part of the project, encoding secret scientific knowledge in the plays and legend around Shakespeare. He seems to have taken over that role from John Dee after the latter died and Bacon became the head of Rosicrucianism. I don't know this, as I'm just going down this rabbit hole, but this is Alan Green's stance. Do check out the rest of his videos, he has great stuff.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Edward de Vere only seems a likely candidate because we don't have anything he wrote so we can't make the same comparison.

The only reason he is ever brought up is snobbery.

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How are you even drawing this conclusion? There are lots of parallels between Edward de Vere and Shakespeare.