you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

That's because the example of the flying ford pinto was using the rhetorical device called "ad absurdum". This points out that the logical extension of a flawed premise leads only to absurdity. The flawed premise was that equating a recognition that the pfizer, moderna, etc shots do not prevent catching or transmitting this virus is equal to a "fear of vaccination".
These treatments provide immunity in the same way a Pinto can fly, ie they don't work as advertised.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Are you saying you weren't in that Ford Pinto?