So they are telling the unjabbed to take the jab because the jab works And telling the jabbed to get a booster because the jab doesn’t work All while telling everyone that the unjabbed are putting the jabbed in danger by not getting the jab that didn’t protect the jabbed. #science

submitted by Orangutan from (i.imgur.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Your leap of logic seems to have been done in that Ford Pinto.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

this says we're looking at a winter of severe illness and death. Realistically that will happen to just 1% of people vaccinated or not. Why do we have the website of the president putting this out. Weird times.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

That's because the example of the flying ford pinto was using the rhetorical device called "ad absurdum". This points out that the logical extension of a flawed premise leads only to absurdity. The flawed premise was that equating a recognition that the pfizer, moderna, etc shots do not prevent catching or transmitting this virus is equal to a "fear of vaccination".
These treatments provide immunity in the same way a Pinto can fly, ie they don't work as advertised.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Are you saying you weren't in that Ford Pinto?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

check his name, it's satire, laughing about myocarditis

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I had noticed. It's funny.