You're asking me how a buildup of the population achieving lengths of immunity, while the most vulnerable are eliminated, would eventually result in the (inevitable, predictable) subsequent decline of the death rate?

No, I'm asking how you know that the decline after the second wave is "natural immunity" (and not related to the vaccine), whereas the decline after the first wave wasn't.

How does that make it clear in your mind? The numbers themselves are inflated for causality (i.e. "covid deaths") so referring to either one to support the other results in circular logic.

No, I'm using the total mortality. Over the CoVID months, about 660,000 more americans died than average for that period. Since the deaths attributed to CoVID is less than that, (although closer than it has been. They're reporting about 620,000 at some sources at the moment, which is within the margin of error for the excess deaths), we must suspect that the number of CoVID deaths is deflated.

Data derived and tabulated into official databases is inherently what officials "say it is". That's no more of an indication of truth than any other incorrect and falsely inflated data that enters into an official database.

You're pretty good at claiming the data is false, but you haven't presented any true data. That's not impressive. You can't know and shouldn't suspect that the data is false until you've got the data that you think is true to compare it with.

They are perfectly not motivated to correct data, because faulty data of this nature is in almost all cases impossible to retroactively correct.

This is complete bullshit. They are correcting the provisional data when the more precise data comes in.

"Death counts for earlier weeks are continually revised and may increase or decrease as new and updated death certificate data are received from the states by NCHS." -https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

Causality is a hard link to establish with covid and it's very easy to inflate.

It's not that hard in most cases. The patient died of pneumonia or sceptic shock, you look at what the infection was. If it was CoVID, that's what killed them.

But if we're going to make a call in close cases, then the medical professionals making the calls are probably able to make a more accurate estimate than your good self.

Deaths already occurring are being lumped in and labeled under the groupon "covid deaths".

You'll have copious proof of this specious claim?

Do you not understand waves of spreading and herds achieving immunity?

No you'll have to explain why you know that the end of the second wave was due to natural immunity and not the vaccine, while the end of the first wave wasn't due to natural immunity.

Because I can't see what you're looking at to know that they're different.