you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AirSeddit88[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 1 insightful - 0 fun - an hour ago We are all "Jews" now

Oh christ! You lost me right there buddy. Who do you think the Davos psychopaths are?

"Who do you think the Davos psychopaths are?"

I hear you. Pulling out that hoary and abused cliche to describe the situation is on the face of it over-the-top and discredits the entire argument. Except that it doesn't. It describes the situation all too well.

(I am considering dropping it, but, well, we gotta face facts, or perhaps you can persuade me the facts are otherwise. Please let me know what you think after reading this post.)

Who do I think the Davos psychopaths are?

Warning, it's red pill time.

In short, the Davos psychopaths are fascists. They believe that corporations and government are natural partners and should govern the people with absolute authority. They believe in government of the people by the government for those who own the government - like Nazis, and the Wall Street and European bankers who financed the Nazis. Well, there is Klaus Schwab, for instance. Please look up his childhood circumstances and plans for the "Great Reset". Then there is Bill Gates, who is a rabid eugenicist - like his buddy Jeffrey Epstein - who comes from a family of eugenicist central bankers. Then there are the Davos crowd, the world's richest people. How do you suppose they got that way? A great work ethic? Thrift? The unfortunate largely unknown historical fact is that, in short, the Nazi's had lots of support on Wall Street and those bankers didn't blow away after the war. Senator Prescott Bush, who fathered two presidential shrubs, was nearly convicted for colluding with the Nazis as chairman of Union Banking Corporation, but got off because he'd also become the voice of the politically untouchable USO. (He and his sons were all members of Yale's Skull and Bones society which is as elitist and secretive and anti-populist as it gets outside of the deeply cultish Bohemian Grove, also popular with authoritarian corporate and government types. I believe the Dulles brothers Allan and Charles Foster, were also members. Most people don't know that the Dulles brothers more or less laid down the script for World War II by actually writing the Treaty of Versailles themselves. After the second world war, Reinhard Gehlen, Chief of Eastern European Intelligence under Hitler, was not hanged but hired by the Dulles brothers to work for the CIA, who thereby acquired his spy network intact . Gehlen wrote the reports on Soviet capabilities that landed verbatim on the desk of Eisenhower and Truman and fueled the Cold War. Then there was Operation Paperclip, in which the US imported wholesale the best Nazi minds into the nascent "military-industrial complex" of which Eisenhower and Kennedy warned. NASA's Wernher Von Braun was one. They never got "de-nazified". Martin Bormann apparently survived the war with much Nazi loot (including Templar treasure found by Otto Skorzeny) squirreled away abroad already, with which he founded the Nazi International, an ongoing but secret player on the global scene.

"The Germans lost the war, but the Nazis just changed addresses." -Author Jim Marrs

I don't mean to say the NWO is all nazis. Maybe the CIA is. All such organizations are riddled with factions and I'm sure I couldn't guess at most. There is certainly the communist CCP to be considered - Biden, y'know.

Nazi's and communists working together toward the NWO? Am I mad? Maybe. But you see, they are both totalitarian/authoritarian. They both agree that people are chattel, to be ruled with an iron fist. And it seems they were both sponsored by the same villains, but that's another story,

There is a great deal of history that they don't teach us in school.

Did you follow the rabbit?

[–]AirSeddit88[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

InvoluntaryHalibut my friend, I think you are right, having thought it through. I pretty much shoot myself in the foot with the cliche. I'll edit now. Thank you very much for your thoughtful feedback.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well you certainly don’t need to edit your posts to please me. I agree with much of what you are saying but I totally disagree with how you frame it in a historical context. These are elite progressive they align with the marxists and certainly not the fascists.

in short, the Nazi's had lots of support on Wall Street

That is not true. Wall street funded the bosheviks just as it does today. Men like Jacob Shiff funded the russian revolution and the failed communist revolution of the 20s in Germany. Like Soros supports marxist movements in countless countries today. Elite millionaires and billionaires with progressive ‘cosmopolitan’ morals seek to destroy traditional values in every country they operate within, and centralize power among the elites.

Traditional values established by the traditional people of every country are the rules that prevent them from running roughshod over the peasants. They hate the native religion of every country they live in. If they are in Europe their enemy is christianity and they promote every other religion. If they are in the middle east they are undermining islam. If they are in Burma they are undermining Buddhism.

They love abortion, and gay sex — they hate people getting married and having families. They seek to destroy all culture and replace it with their post-national universal culture. I suppose they hate traditional culture because it binds the little people together against the perverse immoral aristocracy. This is not fascism, this is marxism, this is post modernism.

Culture is rules. The rule set is not universal. Fair play varies from culture to culture. So of course we can not all cooperate and operate under the same set of rules. Each of our groups have different rules. The US and Europe have evolved very high trust societies that are prosperous and egalitarian because of our culture, not the constitution. We have a strict set of rules that helps us conserve our prosperity. Other people from other societies will only inject chaos by bringing their respective rules. The elites count on this because cultural rules are their enemy. They want to divorce government and business from cultural rules and write their own rules.

They think the rules should come from rich lawyers and not the morals of the people. This is typical of progressive COMMUNISTS who want to sanitize culture and erase our history. Its not fascism at all.

Communism is not the polar opposite of hyper-capitalism as we’ve seen with China. They are two flavors of the same thing, a massively inflated bureacracy. It makes no difference whether a big chunk of that bureacracy is ‘private sector’ when they are all in bed together. The bureaucracy of a society should be small and efficient since it is pure overhead that creates no wealth. And it should be completely in the hands of member of the ethnocentric society that share the morals of that culture. You can’t have foreigners from different cultures running your bureacracy, because they don’t follow the rules of the culture. That is the problem with globalists— they colonize other cultures they have no respect for. India’s corporations need to be run for the benefit of India. Mexico’s corporations need to be run for the benefit of Mexico.

[–]AirSeddit88[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well you certainly don’t need to edit your posts to please me.

Thank you. I did so because you are quite right. (Thought I'd posted this already please forgive if I repeat) correct or not I was shooting myself in the foot rhetorically with that hoary and much-abused cliche. Thank you for your feedback.