you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm no Hitlerite, I just despise lies when truth will do. I also agree somewhat with the contention that the Church was largely subverted by various factions, including neo-platonic Jesuitism and that modern day Jews are the very opposite of biblical Jews or Nazarite Jews who followed Christ. God in the Old Testament continuously rebuked the Jews as did Moses, despite God picking Jews as the seed to which they were to follow God and then Messiah in truth.

They refused and were stubborn and so another nation was picked to spread the gospel.

Sure, I'm biased, everyone is, but you, yourself are just as biased. You did write, for instance, that JFK was a secret protestant whose goal was to subvert the Catholic church; when in fact he was a Catholic and was murdered by P2 lodge Freemasons who infiltrated the Church; Grand Orient Freemasons, Scottish Rite Freemasons (evidenced in the anti-JFK pact) and Ziofascists such as the Irgun and Israeli intelligence and their 5th column in the US aligned with the pro-interventionist CIA, which were at odds with Smith, JFK and Fulbright, the latter who openly exposed Jewish Zionist control in congress.

And, similarly, users claim here that Israel isn't Jewish. Howevet, it is directly referenced in their Limited Liability company as a Jewish majority state. Hence, Zionist Jews and non-Jews, including Jesuit Zionists and Orthodox Jewish Zionists of all types in the US are breaking the law when they hold public office.

You claim that I'm biased but this is coming from someone who uses Phelps, a known disinformation agent and this Southern Israelite researcher, who, despite me agreeing with some of what he says, he is, nevertheless, a Freemason. So, you have been, unintentionally or intentionally, covering for Freemasonry and sourcing freemasons.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think I've ever used Phelps as a direct source even once. Likewise, I also don't agree with a lot of what Drake says, but he is well sourced about his arguments to the point I can respect his points of view.

I never said that the Kennedys being secret protestants was factual, I actually said that it was just a rumour I heard. I don't get the butthurt behind this.

Also yeah, I don't think you are in anyway legit /u/Jesus. You admitted your hatred towards the flesh and of human subjectivity already. That's the basic principles behind everything the Jesuits do.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You continuously use Freemasons as sources. Hatred of flesh is not renouncement of flesh and its desires. There's a difference.

No, Jesus told us to preach the gospel and turn the other cheek. So, no, not a Jesuit. Jesus was clear that salvation only comes through Him.