Bayer sold a medicine tainted with HIV. Once it was discovered in the US, they continued to sell it overseas for over a year in order to clear stock.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from nytimes.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (21 children)

Does the whole of Bayer deserve disrepute over this mistake? There were probably a lot of hard workers that had nothing to do with this.

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Strawman.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

What do you mean? I am not attacking the company, just stating that the whole of it may not have been involved in that operation.

[–]PeterBuilt 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

the good news is that bayer is involved in the production of vaccines.

if it is all the same to everybody, i want my vaccine NOT laced with HIV..

in fact, my preference is to skip the vaccine.

fuck bayer.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Want STD's the old fashioned way huh?

"fuck bayer"

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

It's a strawman because no one was claiming that everyone down to the cleaner was at fault for the company's decisions.

That's a standpoint you created to moan about to distract from the actual problem.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

So the answer was a No. Just needed clarification. The whole company isn't at fault.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Did you sign up just to defend a multinational pharmaceutical corporation?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

No, I'm just attempting to provide some counter-balance for targets that are often picked on around these sites. Its a challenge.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

No, I'm just attempting to provide some counter-balance for targets that are often picked on around these sites. Its a challenge.

This low-budget shilling is beyond disgraceful.

I doubt you'll have a job in the morning.

Unless, you're in the military.
If that's the case then you're trapped in a hideous situation. Couldn't get fired if you tried, and nobody's signing up.
A voluntary homunculus.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It takes great sacrifice and courage to be one of those! Thank you for your contribution!

Nah I'm just trying to comment differently for a bit. The narrative that has been set for a while hasn't gone anywhere, its better to try and defend the bad guys sometimes; they could mend with that token of gratitude. And if we can't mend all the dumb shit, its going to get worse and doesn't need to. So, good intentions or w/e

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

they could mend with that token of gratitude.

These groups aren't interested in mending.

They're working on a depopulation agenda.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

There were probably a lot of hard workers that had nothing to do with this.

It gets worse.

As Bayer descended into hell they decided to cut the parachute, and now they've merged with Monsanto.

It's a terminal-velocity swan dive into hell.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is overly dramatic.

[–]whistlepig 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whether there are plenty of useful idiots who work for the company are completely beside the point. Its not like anyone would be crazy enough to argue that Bayer as a company has any moral base.

Here's one of the first links a basic web search brought up. Although a simple web search seems to dredge up a seemingly bottomless pit of evil.

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/bayer

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

But it was NOT a mistake. After getting caught by the FDA, Bayer negotiated with their friends in that "regulatory agency" that they wouldn't tell the European Union's regulatory about this tainted medication, specifically SO THEY COULD CONTINUE SELLING IT.

It's not a mistake when it's SCHEMED AND INTENTIONAL.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not a mistake when it's SCHEMED AND INTENTIONAL.

They are Bankster owned. They have smart scientists, and good intel.

The executives said "we have quarterly profits to make; HIV HOAX, BE DAMNED!"

The only virus that "killed" people before the Covid Hoax was the HIV Hoax.

These PsyOp hoaxes are stackable in their psychological effect on the public.

If the Spanish Flu killed 50-100 million people, then where are the mass graves?

Don't believe me??? Check out these staged photos of healthy hoaxsters.
Look closely:

  • Every photo is well framed.

  • The areas around each bed is clean and tidy.

  • No mucosal filth on anyone's clean whites.

It's basically an early 20th century version of the tic toc nurses.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=spanish+flu&t=brave&iax=images&ia=images

I could go on, and on with these.

Can you find any things that are there, but shouldn't be; or should be, but aren't? ;-)

It's fun.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, it's fun. ;-)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good point.