The people that believed in that Trump shit are pretty comparable to the people that believe in this 2020 election fraud shit. They're not conspiracy theorists, they're just drooling idiots that blindly swallow whatever the political figures they're rooting for tell them despite the lack of credible evidence.

With regards to the other things you mentioned, you seem a bit confused. So I will give you a handy list of examples, and maybe from this you can figure out what a science denier actually is:

• You believe that the earth is 6,000 years old. The vast majority of relevant and credible science suggests that the earth is several billion years old. As someone that denies the relevance and credibility of what the scientists say, this means that you *are* a science denier.
• A "CAGW Nut" would be someone that believes the current warming trend is caused by humans and will eventually lead to serious environmental harm. The vast majority of relevant and credible science suggests, and the vast majority of scientists believe, that this is the case. As someone that accepts the relevance and credibility of what the scientists say, a "CAGW Nut" would *not* be a science denier.

Do you need more examples? Or do you think you might have some idea of what a science denier actually is?