To avoid radical individualism, individual people must choose not to be selfish. Free people must freely choose "a focus on families, clans, and community", or the needy and less fortunate, rather than "me culture" which plagues the west.

THERE IS ONLY ONE MARKET WITH PERFECT COMPETITION: the labor market. Each worker is pit against all the other workers (in a geographical area, within a sphere of competence) for which one will do more for less. As a result of this, people create more and more value and are paid less and less. WHERE DO YOU THINK the massive inequality and iniquity in the current economy comes from?

https://www.advisorperspectives.com/images/content_image/data/07/07ff29d2e2e637e5c74515d2282051bc.png

$48,000 to $63,500 in 60 years. Not very much, correct? Now realize that BACK IN 1967, ONLY ONE PERSON PER HOUSEHOLD WORKED. In 2019, there are almost two income earners per household, so in reality, INCOME IS GOING DOWN. And that's adjusted for OFFICIAL INFLATION NUMBERS

In the long run, radical individualism among gentiles and the fragmentation of gentile culture offer a superior environment for Judaism, corporatism, parasitism, and Freemasonry as a group evolutionary strategy.

One must consider the demoralization of the west; egocentrically destroying traditionalism via radical individualism, which has particularly plagued western millennial thought.

Christians, particularly the existentialist ones, isolate themselves from the world, preventing themselves from proclaiming "The Way," to teach and preach to all Yeshua's instructions of a rightful living in discipleship, ie. a disciplined , Christly way of living.That isolation is one cause in an evident falling away from Yeshua's instructions, the other is a division in Christendom that, willingly or unwillingly, bastardizes Yeshua's teachings.

A churchgoer in a church hierarchy, levitical in its structure and pre-occupied with worldly affairs, was never an obligatory rite for one to sustain, let alone obtain his or her salvation in Christ. Following "The Way" as Christ's disciple could be in the quite of day, unknown to all of Christendom; no name, no saintly epithet and determined every step of the way—sustained in discipleship.

Why then is a mere churchgoer isolated from the world, whilst the wandering disciple with only his cloths and money bag is not?

The world is God's creation but not his thrown, and to willingly isolate yourself from the ailing and needy of this world by the schedule of mere churchgoing is certainly far from the teaching's of Yeshua that were intended to be followed in discipline. But are not our paths in faith subjective? That faith proceeds works and faith leads the way towards works of love, whether it be the wanderer who aids the needy and sick or the churchgoer who does the equivalent? Faith without works is dead. With faith, undivided, non-preferential works of love become a daily occurrence. The mere churchgoer, in his solitude, being of and in this world, only sees glimpses of what Christ has to offer. He is therefore of the world but far from what God intended for him to do through Christ as messenger. That is to renounce the world and everything in it. If one walks through life in faith to God, surrounded by a world full of vultures, he might feel vulnerable, but grace in its simplicity will lead the initiate to his purpose, a purpose which is not individualistic or worldly but Godly, ie. becoming a living sacrifice.

The World needs saving. To isolate yourself from all of God's creation is to abstain yourself from following His instructions through renouncing the world and everything in it. It is God that instructs, true faith that sets the process forward.

Likewise, to alllow yourself to fall into the depths of the schedule of an institution, is to fall from grace; to isolate yourself from God's people. Those needy and sick who need nothing more than for someone to deny himself and the institutions he was raised, to take up his cross and follow Yeshua's instructions in faith as a living sacrifice to God.

A church is oftentimes corrupted, infiltrated and hijacked by worldly pleasures of the flesh; one cannot help then but speak of this apostasy in Christendom. The priests caught molesting underage boys and girls had covered up their apostasy, pinning their guilt on their victims. A "false memory syndrome" devolved in ungodly scientism and psychiatry; these weak, tired and traumatized victims living with such a burden, now blamed themselves for what someone else did. No man could comprehend such trauma, lest he experienced that trauma for himself.

The homosexual community of whom for the most part, are genuinly nice people (whatever one wishes to think of their ungodly lifestyle) appear to have a small subset within their population that molests underage boys at a frequency far greater than heterosexual molestation of young girls based on pop. per capita. That is, if you were to line up 11 heterosexuals, their would be a probability of one in those eleven that would be a sexual molester. If you lined up just one homosexual, he would have 5 victims!

Thus, Illustrating here, that there appears to be a fervent, pederast population within the homosexual community of whom molest underage boys at an unprecendent rate. Why do I speak of this?

Because, likewise, there appears to be a small subset community within Christendom and Judaism, behaving far from the values and principles of these religious institutions; conniving and corrupted in worldly desires they behave.

The New Rome.

The Manifesto‘s Marx, with his call to proletarians of the world to unite and destroy the bourgeois foundation of European nations (religion, family, property) is like Moses federating bands of uprooted migrants and lead them to the plunder of the cananean cities, and is like the prophets calling for the destruction of the nations.

What I find fascinating are the direct parallels between Capitalism and Communism, with only the rare exception, on virtually every point. These are ultimately complimentary systems.

Capitalism was (and is) to the revolutionary United States what Communism was to the revolutionary Soviet Union.

Not surprisingly, in that light, the hyper-Capitalist New Rome book of 1853, like the Communist Manifesto of 1848, also strongly attacks nationality, but from an artificial "radicalist" individualist (rather than an artificial collectivist) perspective.

The Capitalist attack upon Europe, and European peoples, is particularly emphasized in the New Rome.

And for that reason among its prescient authorship should be read.

‘…It is the duty of the American party to combat all European traditions which are incompatible with Americanism; but, above all, that of nationality. To vindicate individualism against nationality, is the office of America.’

The New Rome (1853) – pg 70 – 71

The [1776 Capitalist American] revolution is the offspring of the only people which is not a nation. A gathering of all the exiles of the world -and an exile is a man deprived of his nationality, rejected by his nation- an assemblage whose spring of action was disgust at the national cruelties which they had fled; a convocation from all the corners of the world for conscience sake, for the preservation of this individual sovereignty against the encroachments of national traditions; a horde of emigrants who knew nationality in the guise of national poverty; America was, by force of circumstances, the rendezvous of all to whom nationality had been the source of all their sufferings.

(cont...)

Nations, we have seen, are unions based upon community of speech; this the Americans renounced, in favor of a union based upon a unity of thought; and thus fell nationality, and arose the republic. The native Americans partly have been forced to doff the European part of their title; and they have done wisely. It is the duty of the American party to combat all European traditions which are incompatible with Americanism; but, above all, that of nationality. To vindicate individualism against nationality, is the office of America. This is, at the same time, the whole force and scope of the revolution; thus, the revolution which arose in and with America, must for ever return to it; and America, which began in revolution, must live in it, and end with it. When the dominion of nationality is crushed, and the sovereignty of the individual is attained, everywhere and everyhow, the missions of the [Capitalist] revolution and of America will both be accomplished.