all 6 comments

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Not 2000 years old. Not a torah.

Most likely a book of spells/superstitions.

[–]turtlebam[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Whatever it is, it sure helps to understand the obvious connection between today's current Judaism with the Luciferian sects, the jewish zionists who are running the show and have made the September 11th human sacrifice, dominate Hollywood, etc.. do seem to a large extent a satanic sect.

It's a shame that many do not know that the vast majority of Rabbis in their inner circles do consider non jews as non humans. What jews actually believe in has nothing to do with the old testament: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSy6ENVAJlY

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They definitely are.

[–]CarlDung 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It was no wonder St. Paul said that jews are allied with the devil, synagogue of satan, etc.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

How so?

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The article says it was found in a 2000 years old building not itv is 2000 years old.

The torah is the first 5 books of the Bible this doesn't have nearly enough density of text for that.