you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The form of exercise of this control, noting War Powers have long been revoked except in banking is called irrecusable obligation - through taxation. Since only indirect taxation can be collected on Income, that means an event is taxed, not the Income. The event is endorsement - endorsement of FRNs as negotiable instruments obligates a person the same as Congress in drawing Private Credit.

When cashing checks or even withdrawing from your account with a Withdrawal Slip stamp or write above your signature, "Deposited for credit on account or exchanged for non-negotiable Federal Reserve Notes of equal value". This may raise eyebrows and some suitors got notes telling them to stop. After they did not stop the banks would notify them that the bank, upon advice of the attorneys was not guaranteeing endorsement of the FRNs in any way too. So the attorneys know what is going on with private credit and public money. The bank would of course rather not draw FRNs from the vault - they want you to create them off your Private Credit privileges.

Do you get it? You create the money and then give them your promissory notes and they take them, without your knowledge and charge interest.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, I don't get it. I've seen this type of stuff brought up before, and I've looked into Anna Von Reitz, who makes many mighty claims and seems to be considered as a charlatan.

If you want this to generate conversation, I would suggest taking the time to carefully lay this out with links and bullet points, and maybe even have a part 2, or more. Read it over, check for mistakes, all that jazz. You'd get more viewings and would perhaps help others understand exactly what it is you are saying.

I'm very interested in this because there's a lot of legitimate nomenclature concerning contract law, legal and non-legal persons, and so on. This stuff does exist in the legal and financial system, but I have yet to find a way to reconcile how to utilize any of this.