The Catholic Church stole at least 300,000 Spanish babies and still faces trials because of its crimes to this day.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from ranker.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

This is all coming from the guy that said real Jews were all psychopaths not so long ago...

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Show me exactly where I said that?

/u/useless_aether did the same to me; he claimed I commented some occult link that he said was me trying to seduce him with satanic imagery. I found that comment, and I never commented it, it was someone else; I sent him the link and even then he continued to say it was me. So, provide the comment and right here and now I will say I do not think "Jews" are psychopaths but I do think the Talmud and Lurianic cabala breed psychopaths.

You also asked why I trust the information/site I post. As if trust has anything to do with facts. Then you ignored the post on Bergoglio who hangs out with Talmudics who think that non-Jews are not human and Yeshua is boiling in feces. He often quotes the Talmud which is anti-Christ. Why are Freemasons so enthusiastic about Bergoglio? The Church was always against Freemasons. And now knowing that Protestant Zionists, the CIA and Zionists killed JFK it appears the Jesuit myth is a fraud. That the myth is centered around the old historical Jesuits. They are Jesuits working for Noahide Freemasons. So if the Jesuits were always against Freemasons, why is this Pope inviting Freemasons to speak on his behalf?

I never said real Jews were psychopaths. I base my faith on Yeshua who told his followers that they call themselves Jews but are not. That they are of the synagogue of Satan. Who frequents synagogues? You say Jews, I say anti-Christs. Christ was the "Jew" of God's new covenant with a spiritual Israel. Most "Jews" today are not biblical Jews of the old covenant and even more of them are not Semitic.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why are "Jews" "Jews" then.

Are you a follower of Christ?

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, I believe the figure of Jesus is simply a deification/mythological character based on Julius Caesar:

https://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/esumma.html

Constantine eventually took the figure to make Christianity the main religion of Rome, with the whole thing being his psyop. Then the Jesuits came along and corrupted Catholicism a lot further with their neo-platonism etc...

I honestly don't get why so much people place so much value in the Christian and Jewish holy books. The story of Enkidu and Gilgamesh predates both by a long mile, we've been around for far longer than any of these clowns. Well, I actually do, the power of the Vatican comes from them. I myself am an agnostic. I also like to practice some of the ascetic traditions of the "Santeros", but I still mostly do my own thing.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A deification of Caesar? Polycarp was killed by Caesar and the Romans for simply following Christ and calling himself a Christian.

http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/caesars.html

Quote from Come-and-hear.com:

There is no doubt that Jesus of Nazareth and the Pharisees had a violent dislike for each other. This point has been a delicate one between Jews and Christians ever since. The tension, however, provides a good object lesson on the use of euphemisms and code words used in the Talmud to censor or obscure the meaning of the text.

(Unless otherwise indicated, in the following excerpts we have omitted the Soncino footnotes. To study the footnotes and the full context, follow the link below the excerpt.)

Let us look at this short excerpt from Tractate Sanhedrin. Speaking of a character called "Balaam," a Sage states:

GEMARA. … He practised enchantment by means of his membrum.

In the opinion of many modern rabbinical scholars, "Balaam" was often used by the Sages as an alias or code word for Jesus of Nazareth. For example, consider this statement about Balaam from the prestigious Jewish Encyclopedia:

Henceforth he became the type of false prophets seducing men to lewdness and obscene idolatrous practices (Rev. ii. 14; II Peter ii. 15; Jude 11; Abot. v. 19). The name 'Nicolaitanes,' given to the Christian heretics 'holding the doctrine of Balaam' (Rev. ii. 6, 15), is probably derived from the Grecized form of Balaam, [Hebr. char.] = [Greek char.], and hence also the pseudonym given to Jesus in Sanh. 106b and Git. 57a.

The Jewish Encyclopedia's article on Jesus contains much information about various pseudonyms used for Jesus in the Talmud, including "Balaam," "son of Pandera," and "Ben Stada."

Why would the Sages use a code word for Jesus of Nazareth? Perhaps to avoid confrontations with the Christian establishment. By disguising unflattering remarks about Jesus, only those inside the circle of Talmud believers would understand; Christians, if they ever saw the material, would miss the significance. An example is given by Rabbi Rodkinson in his book, The History of the Talmud. In 1239 A.D., Jewish apostates brought charges in Rome that the Talmud contained sacrilegious sayings about Jesus and His mother. Rabbi Jechial answered the charges (in part) by denying that the Talmud contained any mention of Jesus of Nazareth:

To the other accusations of Donin, that the Talmud terms the followers of Jesus Christ "Minim" (infidels), that it condemns Jesus, that it allows ill-usage of people of other nationalities, etc., he [Rabbi Jechial] replied: "In the Talmud there is no mention of Jesus (Jesu) Christ, but only of another Jesus (Jeshua) who was a disciple of R. Joshua b. Prachia, who lived two hundred years before Christ."

— Rabbi Rodkinson

In a footnote, Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman promotes scholar Rev. Dr. Herford's view that the "harlot" is a reference to Mary, mother of Jesus.

Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, p. 48, suggests that Balaam is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus … Though no name is mentioned to shew which woman is meant, the mother of Jesus may be alluded to, which theory is strengthened by the statement that she mated with a carpenter.

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/censorship_2.html

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, Pagan Romans wanted to hijack the apostles teachings and institutionalize it, as "The Way" following way quite revolutionary in it's understanding of law and love. Before they institutionalized it, they murdered plenty of "The Way" followers.

Then the Jesuits came along and corrupted Catholicism a lot further with their neo-platonism etc...

LaRouche says that... Reach Christopher Hollis books on the Jesuits. Again, there were two orders opposed to each other who took the name of the Jesuits. Both were corrupt. Today, the US is new Rome and the synagogue of Satan and Noahide Freemasons are at the helm.

I honestly don't get why so much people place so much value in the Christian and Jewish holy books.

Because Christianity is what PAGANS called persons who followed Yeshua. Again, read Yeshua's words ONLY, clearly the old covanant is over and the new covanent of preaching "The Way" and following Christ is the creators doing. Yeshua said to turn the other cheek.

Because Yeshua's words are the truth, period.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Provide the comment/source... thanks. Until then, you're putting words in my mouth.