all 9 comments

[–]HegeMoney 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (4 children)

Quite the human specimen:

  • An androgenous judge
  • bushy eye brows (arched for the photo??)
  • an Adams apple suppressing hunch
  • two first names

Imagine if you were on trial, and this judge was assigned to your case.

At the beginning of the trial, this judge flips open your file, and begins looking it over.

After a moment Judge Nathan pauses.

He/she then turns and stares at you, and maintains the exact expression on this photo.

Not cool.

[–]hennaojichan 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

No conflict of interest whatsoevah.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Of course not. This is a coincidence. Just tell this lie often enough and some idiots will believe it.

[–]Dr_Bukkake 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

You can’t make this shit up. lol

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Fitter_Happier 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)