you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Sounds like he's very compassionate about his job and is good at it! If you have someone who's very good at doing what they do, wouldn't you want to call on the best? Occam's razor anyone?

Just because he was called and trusted to do autopsies on some of the most suspect (and secretive) murders that are still questioned to this day, as well powerful, corrupt and disgusting individuals working for the government, doesn't mean there's anything strange about that when you think about it objectively, without the knowledge we know about these people and their cases. Again, wouldn't you want to call on the best?

[–]JimmiesRustler 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Forensics is bullshit. The report can be written to say anything but supposedly it has the illusion of science behind it so we're not allowed to question it. There have been cases where forensic testers have been lazy fucks and didn't bother to do their jobs and just wrote "suspect did it" in the report.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I was just kidding haha, check the gif at the end. This guy is dirtier than my b00ty.

I agree with you, there have been many “errors” in forensics, especially with suspect, high profile autopsies.