Blacks are waking up to the history of jewish control and slavery

submitted by AllCongressIsZionist from johnnygat.com

all 46 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (27 children)

thats good, its important to remember that jewish control are all against us no matter what color of skin

its always good to get blacks on our sides are most of them are big and strong

jewish are trying to turn all blacks against all other skin colors because blacks have the lowest IQ and they're easily influenced,

be cautious around blacks but remember we need them on our side

[–]Anatolia 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (24 children)

because blacks have the lowest IQ

Based on their studies where Ashkenazi's argue they have the highest? Only in their perception of reality. There are low and high IQs among all sorts of races of people across the world. We might be low IQ in a ancient black society. Remember, when London existed there were much grander, spectacular, cleaner civilizations in Africa existing. In a way, everything we know about society began from Egypt. That's not to say one is over the other. Blacks in their fucked up situation from what jews and their useful idiots(clueless jews and white neocon types have done) it's hard to say that a "low IQ" would happen if they weren't being geneitcally attacked from vaccines, shit food, etc. etc. a lot deeper.

[–]soundsalad 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Every study I've seen shows east Asians being the highest.

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yeah it depends, regardless i'm not going to make my ideas of society based on random biases through IQ. every society and people's has their dumb and smart ones. let the smart one leads the ones in their culture. forced multiculturalism is a fraud. if some people wanna mix they can but some sort of "racial hierarchy" isn't the way and never was.

[–]AddledCorpse 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

North Africa does not = black people though?

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

according to the bible it is.

[–]Dragonerne 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

In the US census, North Africans are classified as "White". When people talk of blacks, its usually subsaharan africans.

Egypt might be where your history about society begins but for the rest of us, Sumeria is where history begins. Sumeria learned agriculture from their Blue Eyed Gods.

[–]africant 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

In the US census, North Africans are classified as "White".

same with beaners. to hide the demographic replacement agenda by jews

[–]peety 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

<deleted>

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

egyptians were black

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, they weren't.

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i have in my post history like 10 examples of new escavations where all the designs of everyone is black.

in the bible people of ham were egyptian, (and cannanite).

"no they weren't" isn't an argument.

[–]peety 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

<deleted>

[–]Anatolia 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

...? egypt?

most of it is in the stone ages and has been for thousands of years.

...egypt?

[–]peety 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

<deleted>

[–]Anatolia 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

cherry pick?

Alright lets start this out, I am going to argue in good faith and I hope you do as well. Now I would like to say that a few ancient statutes and sarcophagus's selected to be the representation by jews led whites to block the true origins of the Hebrews is not surprising. However, these few cherry picked items are not the totality of evidence that Egyptians and Hebrews were black. I am going to link to an album full of examples.

Before I do that I would like you to pick up your bible. Genesis 10:6, Genesis 50:11, Lamentations 4:8, Lamentations 5:10, Job 30:30 and Jeremiah 14:2 among other places tell us they were black skinned people. People say there is no historical evidence that they actually were black but that is because they are cherry picked jew sources because they consider themselves the "chosen" people.

The scriptures say Noah's son Ham is the father of Libya, Ethiopia, Egypt and Canaan. This somewhat blends into the Shem (semitic) peoples that inhabited the arabian peninsula, ethiopia, and almost all other places south of turkey and Iran.

Furthermore the Phoenican and Akkadian languages which brought us our modern alphabet, are a subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family that splintered off around 6,000 years ago, the origins of these languages are Cushite languages from Ethiopia and Egypt (not surprising as we know Ethiopia is the birthplace of humanity)

If egyptians aren't black, why are there more ancient jews that existed in India before white jews came?

why do they say the prophet daniel had wooly hair

why do virtually all tomb escavations in egypt depict black people

these depictions of egyptian blacks are pretty much everywhere however this information cannot come to light for white jews want to be the chosen ones and they hide this information from us. The israelites were MISTAKEN for egyptians? if the original egyptians are black, this shows you something.

in jerusalem we have depictions of black moses

in very old books depictions of black jews, black egyptians

herodotus the famous greek historian calls the egyptians people from ethiopia, black

the examples go on and on and on. The people from modern day egypt are a large admixture of people who have conquered egypt since the past days. now filled with many mixed peoples, arabs etc.

I know this is not something that you want to hear, and possibly you have your own evidence on the contrary. But the more I research, the more I find that the original Hebrews as told my scripture and shown by archaeological evidence, are black, wooly hair, dark. Not sons of Japhot, but sons of Shem and Ham.

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Before I do that I would like you to pick up your bible.

Try to read your verses in the context. Lamentations 4:8
"7 Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:"
Almost sounds like the nazarites were Western Europeans. White and red? Like this ?
"8 Their visage is blacker than a coal; they are not known in the streets: their skin cleaveth to their bones; it is withered, it is become like a stick."
If you read it in context, black symbolizes that their faces were unknown to anyone. The rest describe black as a cause of sin or famine or death, not their actual skin color. This is just extremely far reaching and if the rest of your examples are just as bad, it's not very convincing.

If egyptians aren't black, why are there more ancient jews that existed in India before white jews came?

Its unclear if black here refers to what we call blacks today. For instance: Black tartars were wild tartars, not actual black tartars.

why do they say the prophet daniel had wooly hair Imgur

He didn't? He is describing god in a dream of his. You're not reading the context. Wooly hair could also refer to the hair of greeks, anatolians or circassians like this or this

Start reading context instead of cherry-picking verses that you don't even understand. The worst one was when you cherry picked a verse that not only didn't describe the nazarites as black but as pure as snow and whiter than milk lol.

why do virtually all tomb escavations in egypt depict black people

They don't but the sudanese were enemies of Egypt and served as dick washers:
https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/aDzXPqd_460s.jpg Egyptians also destroyed the black savage nubians:
https://www.realmofhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Sudan_Tomb_Cultural_Entanglement_Egyptians_Nubians_1.jpg

these depictions of egyptian blacks are pretty much everywhere however this information cannot come to light for white jews want to be the chosen ones and they hide this information from us. The israelites were MISTAKEN for egyptians? if the original egyptians are black, this shows you something.

They weren't black. Its in Egypt; they were tanned.

herodotus the famous greek historian calls the egyptians people from ethiopia, black

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Aethiopians

I know this is not something that you want to hear, and possibly you have your own evidence on the contrary. But the more I research, the more I find that the original Hebrews as told my scripture and shown by archaeological evidence, are black, wooly hair, dark. Not sons of Japhot, but sons of Shem and Ham.

http://esau.today/100-reasons-israelites-are-white/

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:" Almost sounds like the nazarites were Western Europeans

Nazarites doesn't mean much, thats a specific caste.

Their visage is blacker than a coal

You realize visage is a certain look, expression, demeanor?

Its unclear if black here refers to what we call blacks today. For instance: Black tartars were wild tartars, not actual black tartars.

True a lot of this is uncertain "skin color" wise

He didn't? He is describing god in a dream of his. You're not reading the context. Wooly hair could also refer to the hair of greeks, anatolians or circassians

Good point.

They don't but the sudanese were enemies of Egypt and served as dick washers:

Lol you argument is one picture(that has no source or verification, location, etc, just spread on 4chan) darker slaves than their also dark/african looking masters washing/circumcising their dicks? Slaves were generally always considered darker than their masters as they spent more time in the sun. This is just basics here. Regardless the color of those people in that picture is normal and darker than many africans today. There are plenty of africans that are very light but with lots of melanin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Aethiopians

Just shows my point at how diverse Africa was...

http://esau.today/100-reasons-israelites-are-white/

Is this website seriously your argument. They take https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Adamite theories seriously. Such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Winchell and we need to know that black white or whatever, a large many of humans from the period of 1800+ were retarded as fuck seriously. Read "the secret destiny of america" by Manly P. Hall the 33rd degree freemason and you will see that these people without our breadth of knowledge, technology, limitations with books they could read, were pretty damn stupid. Their prose is as good as ours randomly typing on a forum without even proof reading.

Sigh, I will say there is a lot of conflicting words in the bible. But I am not a dispensationalist, so I don't consider KJV bible the "exact words of god" Additionally that website makes weird claims like only europe had churches, and since Paul wrote to europeans therefore white people are israelites, etc. However things like this page: http://esau.today/i-wouldnt-want-to-be-anti-semetic/ definitely have some value and truth to it.

At the end of the day, are Egyptians not the people of Ham? Were the israelites not mistaken for egyptians? I don't see how one passage by lamentations about a specific type of person means all jews are white?

Its unfortunate that me as an "anti-semite" (aka against what jews have done, besides just financial control and degeneracy, including enslaving blacks) I am stuck between extremes like this.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nazarites doesn't mean much, thats a specific caste.

It's your verse. Why did you choose the verse about Nazarites if they don't mean much?

You realize visage is a certain look, expression, demeanor?

Yes, but it's clear from the context that they weren't black. It meant that they were unknown in the streets. Black faces. Unknown.

I don't see how one passage by lamentations about a specific type of person means all jews are white?

Israelites are not jews. Jews are from Judah, not Israel.
https://www.bible-history.com/biblemaps/wp-content/uploads/51-israel-and-judah-kings-color.png

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's your verse. Why did you choose the verse about Nazarites if they don't mean much?

Well said.

Israelites are not jews. Jews are from Judah, not Israel.

I see. Well thank you for giving me things to look at! I think that many sides are guilty of cherry picking the bible. I recommend listening to the song "lifting the veil" by K-Rino. I would be curious of what you think of it, it discusses the many variations of the bible. I think you will agree with many parts (and disagree with others) I have trouble determining which scriptures are edited, to be trusted. Truly, it all comes from an ancient oral history that to some extent predates egypt/babylon/etc. etc. We act like gilgamesh for example is an older story than Noah, just because we have an older written document of it, but many of these afro-asiatic languages like Hebrew weren't put into writing for quite a long time. It's probable these stories are much older. I tend towards a spiritual examination from a buddhist perspective (not hindu which is paganism, christians tend to mix this up, buddhism is monotheist. I compare judaism to christianity as hinduism is to buddhism) and I find it 99% compatible with the spiritual teachings of Jesus, who I also follow. However, the buddhist perspective I don't think does justice to the spiritual war we find ourselves in that finds itself in the material. Thus, I commend the Jesus stance of establishing a "kingdom of God" and rejecting secular or any other forms of control where "God" is the "God-vernment" which is traditional to many societies from China to Egypt. I believe Jesus was speaking out against the law of Man being the "rule" here, rather than serving God.

Have a blessed day brother

[–]magnora_is_a_faggot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The only parts of Africa that haven't been shit holes were governed by whites.

[–]Anatolia 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Kingdom of Axum? Ethiopia? Kingdom of Ghana? Mali? Berbers? Carthage (realize that non-africans hadn't tamed an elephant until the 19th century) Berbers? Oyo Empire? Ashanti Empire? Kingdom of Kongo?

Realize that the Ashkenazi had to dehumanize black people in order to justify their dominance. The same ideology they use to claim they have superior intelligence, IQ, is the same reasoning they use to say blacks ain't shit.

It's more like Africa has gone to shit since the slave trade. If you read accounts by the portuguese going into africa you will find that they saw nations and states greater than themselves. The origins of masonry and civilization building come from Ethiopia and Egypt and were spread across the world. Caucasion and Mongoloid peoples took the mantle from there and have also built great things.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The origins of masonry and civilization building come from Ethiopia and Egypt and were spread across the world

Egypt had middle eastern genetics.
Ethiopia have also had white populations (https://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ancient-ethiopian-dna-eurasia-20151008-story.html)

[–]peety 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

<deleted>

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I bet you his https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Koll2tjLX_s IQ is trumping yours.

[–]bjam27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's fake dumbass.

[–]MakeAOCBartendAgain 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Professor Griff isn't an actual professor, fyi. Taking this guy's word as fact is probably about as accurate as taking medical advice from Dr. MakeAOCBartendAgain, who isn't a real doctor either.

[–]AllCongressIsZionist[S] 2 insightful - 7 fun2 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

Yep, I found that out the hard way when I bought Dr. Dre's album for medical advice.

[–]MakeAOCBartendAgain 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lmfao!

[–]Breadman 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

Antisemitic bullshit

[–]peety 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

<deleted>

[–]SeasideLimbs 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Not that person and not coming here to stir shit. Just genuinely curious about a couple of things: If there's a jewish conspiracy, how does that square with 1. the fact that the New Left/SJW ideology was created by white, non-jewish, french intellectuals and academics (like Foucault, Deleuze, Guattari, de Beauvoir, Lacan, etc) 2. with the antisemitism that's been getting common among the far-left (like their vilification of Israel and support of Palestine, or their rebranding jewish people as white people and therefore evil oppressors) 3. the coming demographic shifts due to hassidic jews having far more children than your typical liberal hollywood-type jew, leading to the "average jewish person" of the future being somebody who is conservative, family-oriented, heavily religious and lower-class/lower-middle-class rather than upper-middle-class/upper-class, anti-family and liberal.

[–]peety 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

<deleted>

[–]SeasideLimbs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

as far as the jewish rebranding, jews do that themselves all over twitter. i have a link i could find if you'd like it.

Sure, I would like to see that if you don't mind. I do remember also seeing SJWs who see jews as overly powerful and overly in control of media and such and felt like demonizing them as white (and therefore evil) for that reason. There's likely some organic rebranding of jews as white/oppressors happening among the far left, although it would be interesting to see jewish people do that themselves.

antisemetism- the special word for racism against jews. funny how they think themselves special, likely they made their own word.

It's interesting I guess. I'd agree with you that it's pretty clear that jewish people are in a special position when it comes to how cultures see different ethnicities. Few groups could claim a position of victimhood as securely as jewish people for the last couple of decades. Then again, there is a clear historical reason for that. The second world war clearly traumatized and left its mark on western culture. In fact, I'm personally convinced that much of the obsession with victimhood, weakness-as-a-virtue and demonization of power we see today among the far-left is the result of that trauma - a sort of cultural PTSD. Just a pet theory of mine.

i have no idea and don't know what their breeding/views have to do with anything. noise.

My point there is basically that the type of jewish person who is considered to have created and upholds this conspiracy is in the process of dying out. Highly educated and financially wealthy jewish people tend to have few children. Meanwhile, deeply religious and conservative jewish people have far more children. These are people who are "outbreeding" left-wing jews and who are politically and ideologically opposed to left-wing jews. This will likely lead to friction in the future among the jewish community. Left-wing jews are still the most visible due to their positions in media and politics, but conservative jews have the numbers. My question was whether you think this rift among the jewish community itself negatively affects a current jewish conspiracy / whether it will negatively affect it in the future.

[–]peety 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

<deleted>

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They also renounce Yeshua's teachings. Read the Talmud. There is plenty of terrible verses in it directed at non-Jews.

[–]Breadman 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

aaaaand blocked

[–]peety 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

<deleted>

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Anti-Semitism is a misnormer.

[–]Breadman 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

aaaand blocked

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's fine. I'll block no one for thinking differently.

[–]TokLwdSaNthg 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

“First and foremost I extend my deepest and most sincere apologies to my Jewish sisters and brothers for the hurtful and divisive words that came out of my mouth during my interview with Richard Griffin,” Cannon tweeted. He continued, “They reinforced the worst stereotypes of a proud and magnificent people and I feel ashamed of the uninformed and naïve place that these words came from. The video of this interview has since been removed.” In his apology of the comments he made with former Public Enemy member Richard Griffin, aka Professor Griff, who was fired by the band for his anti-Semitic remarks.”

[–]Tortoise 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

🙄

[–]peety 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

<deleted>