you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not really, the increase of warming has been at a faster rate in the past 150 yrs.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

stop making unsourced statements

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

warming has been at a faster rate in the past 150 yrs.

Has greenhouse gas and pollution led to an increase in rate, we don't know. Now if we were to compare to say 11,000 years ago, it would be a moot point.

https://assets.weforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/JMA-chart.jpg

https://inhabitat.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2016/08/Global-Temperatures-889x293.jpg

The current trend is a a larger increase over a shorter period of time, HOWEVER, catosrophic events have occured and the ecosystem was able to evolve and change even during these events.

So, climate change, which is a dumb word to choose if you want to proof others that pollution and greenhouse gases leads to warmer temps., can easily be mitigated and is likely a non-issue, for now.

Deforestatin and pollution are the issues of today.

The global average temperatures in the pre-industrial era fluctuated but rates of warming were fastest in the late 20th century.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The hockey stick sham was debunked.

The scientists making the claim were held in contempt of court for withholding the data.