all 42 comments

[–]FormosaOolong 9 insightful - 8 fun9 insightful - 7 fun10 insightful - 8 fun -  (4 children)

The entire system is raging syphilis! Rotting, corroding flesh falling from a monster that eats itself!

[–]hennaojisan 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

See? See what I mean? More sexual innuendo smeared on to Buttigieg'a name. He is a man—not a rectal toy made of questionable, toxic material that might decompose slowly, releasing toxic, infectious materials into the peoples' holy of holies.

[–]FormosaOolong 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I think you are making a funny here, but just in case, I want to clarify that I was calling the system a syphilitic zombie.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

But do you know he's a man? He seems like a putrid yeasty twat to me.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Like a leper with syphilitic-herpes.

If it goes unchecked it is known to induce madness.

There is also a degree of tragic reoccurrence...

Piled upon the deleterious decay of a hapless reality TV leper society...

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (17 children)

IT WASN'T THE RUSSIANS!!!

[–]FormosaOolong 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun -  (16 children)

But tv sweeheart Rachel Madcow said it was!!

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

Rhodes scholar double agent.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

cecil rhodes, a rothschild agent

[–]FormosaOolong 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

the rhodes to hell are paved with gold...

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Slave gold from a Rhodes owned South African mine. :-/

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A+++

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

That's my thought, anyway.

Rhodes scholars should be shunned.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Bill Clinton also rhodes scholar.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

He sure is. He passed NAFTA and betrayed the american worker.

Guess who pushed it through for him? Mossad Agent's (mother) son Rahm Emanuel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rahm_Emanuel

Following the campaign, Emanuel became a senior advisor to Clinton at the White House from 1993 to 1998.[37] In the White House, Emanuel was initially Assistant to the President for Political Affairs[38] and then Senior Advisor to the President for Policy and Strategy.[39] He was a leading strategist in White House efforts to institute NAFTA,[40][41] among other Clinton initiatives.

What do you think the chances are that he's not also Mossad?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Rahm was real president for obama, handled things but for just a couple years, very unpopular, he became mayor of chicago which seemed like a downgrade but I guess the Mossad figured controlling the middle of america was an important thing.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Rahm was probably one of a number of actual shot-callers. Clinton was another (for foreign policy at least).

I don't know about the second term. Probably Biden, as they tried to position him for the 2020 run.

Barry had probably given up on any notion of leadership by then.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

not sure but yeah barry definitely was just for public relations. Giving speeches and such. Trump is like that too to be fair. Jared Kushner in charge. The chief of staff is usually the mossad handler. Hillary had Huma running things, who was married to that guy Weiner. They tried setting up Weiner as mayor of NYC, kind of like Rahm but well he was into pizzas. Having Huma in charge of the state department, all they did was try to help Al Qaeda and ISIS. Of course Israel was fine with that.

[–]hennaojisan 4 insightful - 7 fun4 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

I think it's unfair that people equate Buttigieg's name with buttplug even if he resembles one of those cheap, Chinese ones that fall apart as soon as pressure is applied by a resistant sphincter.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Naw. I think it's perfectly fair.

He was probably selected for that very reason. To stick this dipshit up the American political system's ass.

[–]Vigte 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The Antedote! Nice. A fave.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

LMAO.

ITT: The dude's name sounds like booty-gig

[–]jmichaelhudsondotnet 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Zionists hate bernie, they even call him antisemitic.

Same zionists love epstein, weinstein, biden, trump.

Most comments here are to slide any real discussion of zionism and poison pill.

Ill leave this here: https://archive.is/FRGCj

Also beware, the jewish defense league will stalk and harass you in public if you point out facts like their shadowwhatever app in iowa.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

[–]DffrntDrmmr 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

They'll never pry state secrets from Buttplug... not that he'd object to them trying.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

He's only a mayor. City Hall can be beat.

Hopefully Sanders gives him a thorough beating.

[–]DffrntDrmmr 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Only the mayor of a mid-size city, at that.

He arrived on the scene claiming to be the most qualified to be president of the United States and leader of the free world due to his 'superior' management experience.

That claim was based on serving as mayor and his job after college.

When the candidates initially came out swinging their identity politics in the first debate, he tried that, too. When he still failed to muster significant minority support he tilted to the center, which is working for him, it appears.

I think he's pretentious. He's certainly audacious.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

It says micro, but they always feel bigger.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I was talking about the other end.

When I lived in NYC I had a friend who used to visit one week a year, for business. She lived in Montréal then moved to Vancouver. Anyway, one time she showed up with a bag full of sex toys and a bag full of coke. I've never bothered to collect anything but memories so that was a learning experience. Oh the things one will do with/for/on coke.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

Remember what I said about your disgusting sexual non-sequiturs, and you're like "what are you talking about? I never do that"

This is what I'm talking about.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is not a non-sequitur. This is a direct response to the OP poster who shared the image. It's hardly disgusting or graphic. I certainly could delve but I most definitely don't. I don't bring these stories up from nowhere. If you fail to see the connections I can expound on anything I've said previously to make it clearer.

Also, she's still a very good friend - as are most of my exes. And there's nothing disgusting about her.

If you have issues regarding sexual content, beyond the no-porn rule, from innuendo to graphic, it might be nice to clarify that for us all.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm just saying, you say you never do it, yet you do. I get tired of the hypocrisy is all. Just own it at least.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I own that I'm a hypocrite in a lot of ways, like everyone, without exception.

But in my opinion I don't randomly pull out "disgusting sexual non-sequiturs". Your conservative values might find my non-graphic exploits about consenting adults disgusting - and you may even insist they are "dragging down" the conversation. I don't see it that way but I'm willing to learn if you explain further, ideally with a list of examples rather than just an occasional arbitrary frowny opinion.

It also wouldn't hurt if you actually disciplined those who are actually clearly breaking the rules, whether it's name-calling, linking to trans porn, etc. That might remove much temptation to perpetuate the gutter talk in many folks - and even me.

Obviously I was quite liberal for decades. Theoretically I still am. So far as "smutty stories" go, while I wouldn't applaud a ban, I would accept it were you to lay out some rules/guides/examples against it - for the greater good - just like I understand why porn is banned. Unfortunately many posted articles share far worse than I've written and I don't even know how you might begin to deal with those conversations. I don't envy your burdens.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Grayzone is a controlled opposition site. They blocked me on Twitter. Buttgig is probably CIA backed.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I've heard they were. Probably from yourself.

I'm not going to object to them calling out the rigged primaries.