Anti-porn bills in eight states would force the likes of Apple and Samsung to automatically censor nude and sexually explicit content

submitted by [deleted] from dailymail.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Ehhhhhh 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Then advocate against porn. Don't control people or intrude on privacy.

Parents should bear the burden of controlled their kids access to devices and internet.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

SuperMarioLogan was repeatedly demonetized and eventually banned because parents think it's somehow his fault that they weren't teaching their kids not to act like Jeffy.

[–]Godknight 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Tell it to the victims.

[–]Ehhhhhh 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Parents should control their children to protect them from harm from viewing as they should keep them from walking into traffic or drinking bleach.

The law should be protecting people from being trafficked.

Allowing controls such as this is loss of privacy and additional monitoring and control over all of us.

Pretty sure that as a shill you know that your argument is stupid, though.

[–]Godknight 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then why aren't they allowed to drink, smoke or drive?