Wikipedia has become a one-sided 'thought police' for liberals, cofounder warns. "In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources — and sources friendly to globalist progressivism — are permitted"

submitted by Chipit from (justthenews.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The webside is not trustworthy, obviously. For example: how were those laptop contents obtained? How do we know that those are the actual contents? Because someone said so? Think about the sources and why they are not trustworthy. Those laptop contents were changed in order to fit the narrative at that website. It is obvious, common sense, logical, and there is no link that will provide the actual laptop contents because those sites cannot be trusted to provide the actual contents. Do you understand why this doesn't work?

Instead of attacking me, for the 3rd time, provide an argument and reliable evidence.

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Those laptop contents were changed in order to fit the narrative at that website.

[citation needed]

Boy, how far you've driven the conversation from the topic: the destruction of Wikipedia's NPOV at the hands of left-wing political agitators. You paid social media influencers are getting better at this, just like I predicted.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Socks is a professional-level intentional timesuck.

Time wasted on socks is time not exposing or resisting tyranny.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You paid social media influencers

4th fucking attack, and your evidence is the laptop?

Think of it this way: are the so-called Biden laptop contents admissible in a court of law? Has the FBI shared all of the contents? Which portions have been shared? Will anyone in the FBI be able to corroborate that these contents came from the Biden laptop? There are some leaked emails that seem to trace back to the laptop as a source, but have the origins of those leaks been confirmed? Which emails are the newspapers most interested in? Although some of the emails indicate potential arrangements for communication between Biden family members and business associates, is there any evidence of wrongdoing? Did anyone break the law? The fact is: the supposed laptop contents and the emails cannot be used as evidence of anything illegal or of major consequence, and if it were permissible as evidence, it still doesn't point to anything illegal, and thus any claims of illegal activity are founded only on uncorroborated information. Keep in mind that the main stream news media are also trying their best to use this information to dig up dirt. Even the Washington Post tried to interpret an issue regarding a dinner meeting. Moreover, think about the way in which Rudy Giuliani was used to share this mysterious hard drive, about which we know very little. To use the best choice of words on this, see Wikipedia's summary, which starts with:

The Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory is a series of unevidenced claims centered on the false allegation that while Joe Biden was vice president of the United States, he engaged in corrupt activities relating to the employment of his son Hunter Biden by the Ukrainian gas company Burisma..

Do you really need a citation for something that's so well-known? Does someone really want to pay me to tell people like you these basic facts? Absolutely not. Simply check the sources. You must know that posts at Saidit should be cross-examined for accuracy, if one wants to understand them.

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The fact that the laptop story was censored quickly became a bigger story than the actual laptop.

I can't believe you're actually citing Wikipedia in a thread about the destruction of Wikipedia's NPOV.