all 41 comments

[–]HibikiBlack 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Political correctness all by itself basically destroyed the level of discourse everywhere too. Not only is it used as a tool for censorship, but It's used for ethnic genocide too, along with the migration laws.

They destroy language and people's own ethnic origins.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

#FightElitesNotEachOther

[–]Chad_the_Larp 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh boy, your incredibly naive. Maybe you should step outside of your suburban safe space so you can see what people are like.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I would wager my life that the flames of animosity would die down if the ruling class corporatocracy were to stop fanning them.

Heck, I am. I'm writing the most subversive screenplay/graphic novel that I can muster. On the off chance it's successful, it would be in their best interest to silence me and people like me. Thus censorship is as rampant as they can get away with.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Interestingly, in the Pravada when TYrotsky and Lenin took the reign, this word was used often.

[–]RickC-137 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Well maayyyyybe you should stop posting links to conspiracy websites like Amerrrrrican Thiinnnnker. Go straight to CNN for the real source.

Hard Sarcasm.

[–]Orjuan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well, obviously. The same people who made political correctness, as well as lean very much to the left, are also the same ones who claim to be an impartial and absolute council on what is politically correct or not. It's a very simple case of who has the power and if they can be trusted with it.

[–]DffrntDrmmr 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Historically, after a far-left group gains political power, they soon begin culling all of those not considered politically-correct.

[–]Malki 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I would not say that the alternative to political correctness is harmless. But I agree it's to shut down debate most certainly. Also kind of narrow minded and cowardly that people think things need to be harmless in the first place.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it's the wolves who want to pacify us completely, to make us all into lambs.

they are hungry..

[–]Xena 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am NOT politically correct, but I am against mental non violence. If somebody attacks me, I want to to see him on his knees. And if I can't win, I will be a mental pest for everybody.

[–]fruitjack 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

by "debate" they mean, of course, the promotion of white supremacy. by 'logical thinking' they mean tin foil conspiracy theory.

[–]useless_aether[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

but we know the leftist msm is fake news and we know those who are trying to scare the (mostly white :-) population with 'white supremacy' are genocidal, racists, communists calling themselves progressives. look no further than the sanders campaigners planning concentration camps and gulags for americans at this very moment.. or look at trudeau and how he stifles free speech and other liberties in canada: criminals are often very logical thinkers..

[–]Chipit 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

This reddit thinking, not pyramid of debate thinking.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮

[–]Captzapheart 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

I think what's not said enough about P.C is that it is a concept much like any other, It can be wielded for benevolent intent or malignant intent. It is not P.C that's the problem, it is those who wish to use it for selfish intent whether in favour or against it.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Political Correctness requires self-censorship.

It is inherently problematic.

[–]Captzapheart 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Civilised conduct demands self censorship.... I'm practicing it right now with you dumb fools. : )

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly.

I don't mind coarse criticism. Maybe I am a fool.

Pretend to believe something that isn't true or real, because it may hurt someone's feelings is unacceptable.

[–]Thugnificent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Acting "civilized" demands self discipline not self censorship lmao. Sort of like how not reacting like an emotional cripple to naughty no no words demands self discipline. And maturity. Wanna be brown shirts who creep around telling other people what they should think/say demand self censorship. They demand literally mentally retarding yourself for the sake of other retarded people and their ass-backward sensibilities. Besides the entire concept of "civilised conduct" and how it's been abused since it's conception is almost exactly the same as the idea of political correctness. It serves no practical purpose besides controlling serfs and maintaining the status quo. Respect simply demands respect in turn. Treat other people how you want to be treated. That's civility. No human being in their right mind wants to be censored for honestly expressing an opinion, as ignorant or offensive as that opinion may be. In what way is political correctness ever wielded benevolently? Teaching people to respect each other is called good education lol. No "political correctness" or self-censorship required. What a gross orwellian concept

[–]somercet 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

P.C. is inextricably linked to Marxism. it is inherently bad.

[–]Captzapheart 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can tell you are very well versed in the works of Marx's, can you tell me where or what book he states he is a proponent of P.C culture? I've only read " das capital " there's nothing there about P.C.

[–]RickC-137 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Yeh, we wouldn't want to hurt peoples feelings with hateful and destructive words now would we?

[–]beermeem 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

bUt MuH pYraMiD oF dEbaTe

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The pyramid philosophy isn't affected by PC bullshit.

Facts, are facts.

Evidence, is evidence.

Fallacies, are fallacies.

Name calling is for bitches.

Ya bitch!

[–]Captzapheart 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Communication ideally should never be hateful and destructive, it should add value. I think you may struggling on that one.

[–]RickC-137 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

What good are you doing here? None. Stop being hateful toward me and move along.

[–]Captzapheart 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm here in an attempt to add solid value in the form of challenging this poorly informed soggy biscuit party, didn't mean to Come across as hateful and for that I apologise.

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You are coming off as condescending while offering no argument to the contrary.

[–]Captzapheart 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I've made an argument for the contrary earlier in the thread also I can live with coming off as condescending, i think you should grow a thicker skin, this is politics...its a rough game.

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

ahahahaha...the poor victimhood sjw doesn't want to eat his own poison? How typical. It's only BS to get your way. You never offered any info on anything.

[–]Captzapheart 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

After reading your comment I was overcome with embarrassment, it was not my intention to debate a spastic retard....I feel ashamed.

[–]Deaddit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I find it interesting that China is now calling the US 'racist' for the name of the flu or from quarantining their citizens.

'Chinese' is not a race. (See Taiwan + Singapore)

Chinese government has learned that the US politicians LOSE THEIR MIND when called racist by non-whites. And is using this to stifle honest debate and honest solutions to the problem.

[–]NoahWebstersGhost 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

“The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.”

― Philip K. Dick

[–]Chad_the_Larp 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

PC sprung up when trans fags, and other queers got butthurt about people laughing at their deviancy. This was gladly approved by politicians so they can use pc speak to make pedophilia(politicians favortie pastime) look good

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Political correctness is the Hegelian dialectic of the ZioCons. In the end they will front the charge against it.

Ingenious.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

wrong again. the hegelian dialectic is used by the jesuits. as pike wrote zionism will be destroyed, so they are just another device, a thesis to the antithesis of islam.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Pike was a Freemason and often peddled disinformation.

And I agree Zionism WILL BE DESTROYED, EVENTUALLY, but the real goal is multilateralism via the BRIC alliance and that very well could provide ZioCons with another avenue.

The BIS and IMF write about this comingn multilateralism.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Pike was a Freemason and often peddled disinformation.

that's putting it mildly! :-)

but these are from his letters to mazzini (not meant to be public, i assume) and there is no place for disinfo. mazzini was his 'boss'. mazzini took over the illuminati after weishaupt died and mazzini appointed pike to lead american freemasonry. mazzini also collaborated with engels. further, mazzini created the mafia. finally, two sources that i know of claim mazzini was a jesuit priest. there is no way pike would lie to mazzini, otoh, it is much more likely that mazzini lied to pike in some matters.

https://saidit.net/s/Jesuits/comments/3elk/giuseppe_mazzini_and_the_mafia_mazzini_autorizza/

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Have you read this book:

https://archive.org/details/newrome00poes/page/n19/mode/2up

It is rare and I'm starting to read it now ; it is astounding ; it also exposes the countries as corporations and the Rome and Court Jew alliance as well as many other secret societies and the goal of Rome over Israel. It was written by an ex-Socialist; as a reactionary you probably won't want to read it, but the amount of information in it is astounding and it parallels many of the things you've stated.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

socialists/marxists/communists are all masons/satanists. rome - the united states of the world. it is clear they (the two authors) are nwo shills. horoscope - so they are gnostics and satanists as well. yeah, no thanks. this is far from being rare, commies, masons and satanists are everywhere.