Dutch Government Gives Luxury Cruise Ship to Illegal Migrants While Native Citizens Struggle to Pay Heating Bills

submitted by [deleted] from summit.news

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

If you create a problem such as manufacturing mass immigration open to abuse, you prepare for such. Otherwise, close the border. No country has any obligation to accommodate anyone other than their citizens, regardless of them applying for asylum. Furthermore, they have traveled through several safe countries to reach one that would offer them greater benefits. Fuck those people.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Furthermore, they have traveled through several safe countries

How did you determine that? Did you forget that Holland has one of the world's busiest shipping terminal at Antwerp and one of the world's busiest airports? Isn't this just pulled entirely out of your ass? And if it's true - have you discovered something new?

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/09/04/world/europe/europe-refugee-distribution.html

No you haven't, the EU already distribute migrants to countries in the union.

So while the Dutch government assess their asylum claim and asses the route they took to Netherlands and assess which safe country they can go to: I ask you for the sixth time: should they be left on the street? Would that be a good outcome for Dutch citizens? You're a moron who keeps digging deeper and deeper. Can't wait to see what nonsense you come up with next instead of just admitting: this story is a nothingburger and you were an idiot to use it to confirm your bias towards xenophobia

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So now you support mass immigrants using private property to be housed rent free? It wasn't long ago you were arguing the opposite where migrants in the US were to be housed in military accommodation instead of private vacant homes. Or do you now agree with Chipit on this subject? It seems to me that you are intentionally provocative to ensure a spicy debate my friend 🙏

How do you differentiate between protection of one's nation and xenophobia when it comes to being bombarded with a seemingly unlimited supply of military age men from islamostan demanding to be pampered? Governments are doing this to virtue signal to the left while simultaneously trying to avoid more islamostanians blowing themselves up in Christmas markets.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The Martha's Vineyard thing was - chipit believed they should be forcibly placed in people's existing homes by the government. This Dutch thing is - I'm saying they should be housed and not left homeless. Surely you're not so bad faith as to pretend there's no difference between someone not being homeless, and them living out your spare room?

How do you differentiate between protection of one's nation and xenophobia when it comes to being bombarded

How do YOU differentiate between unicorns and dragons when it comes to the leprochaun economy?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Those successfully granted asylum should only have the same right to housing as the citizens. Therefore, they should have no more right to accomodation than the existing homeless citizens themselves. A country must take care of it's own first, before asylum seekers who could be anyone from anywhere. You cannot use people's private property to house homeless and "just build more houses" is not a valid answer given the infinite queue of illegals waiting to scrounge off the system. When surveyed, around one in 4 young Africans want to move to Europe. It is unsustainable.

Asylum applicants have no rights at all to be housed, less so in the luxury of a five star vessel. In the UK, asylum seekers were granted use of an army barracks, they set it on fire demanding hotels. Fuck those people.

If I turn up at your door, would you allow me to shit on your doorstep, raid your fridge, your bank account and then ask that you thank me for the pleasure?

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Therefore, they should have no more right to accomodation than the existing homeless citizens themselves.

Ok great finally someone will answer me. Screw the boat - these refugees should have been left living on the streets of Netherlands. And that's the outcome which you think would have been preferable. While the big empty ship is stuck at harbor. Ok.

If I turn up at your door, would you allow me to shit on your doorstep, raid your fridge, your bank account and then ask that you thank me for the pleasure?

Sounds like you have that image in your head. How did that get there I wonder.

Ok so if the news which you seek out to consume, was full of stories about how grateful they are, how meek and humbled they've become since arriving to UK, how well they're adapting to the bus timetable and corner shops and the argos catalog...would you still be writing about "shitting on my doorstep"?

Sounds like you're seeking out some xenophobic media to consume

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok great finally someone will answer me. Screw the boat - these refugees should have been left living on the streets of Netherlands. And that's the outcome which you think would have been preferable. While the big empty ship is stuck at harbor. Ok.

Yes. And?