Russian army thwarts Ukrainian attack with eight drones on Zaporozhye nuclear power plant.

submitted by HibikiBlack from sana.sy

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

First of all, none of Syrian news or the talking head in the thumbnail are trustworthy sources on this war.

Secondly, why the fuck would Ukraine risk a nuclear disaster on its own clay, surrounded by its own cities.

Thirdly, the Z troops have been firing shells outbound from the NPP grounds, now they want to complain to friendly intl press if targeted munitions are sent into the NPP grounds?

Such pathetic gaslighting liars, and OP sucks for syndicating their bullshit with no context.

If the ruZ were truly worried about the power plant, they would move far far away from it, and stop their torture of the power plant staff.

Remember when they were digging trenches in the contaminated soil of Chernobyl, then left with everything that wasn't glued down, including the computers and measuring equipment? The Z soldiers come from houses without running water. Many hadn't seen paved roads before invading Europe. These are not people who should be looking after a nuclear power plant and I think even the corrupt Assad media would agree

[–]NuclearBadger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

There's plenty of reasons you would want to let a nuclear plant implode. If you can't work it out then that's your own fault.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

No there certainly are not, and "do your own research" is just a figleaf for "you don't have any idea either".

Hey dipshit, there are no good reasons for letting a nuclear plant implode, and if you can't work that one out then it's your own fault

[–]NuclearBadger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

  1. Hiding evidence.

  2. Scare people away from a sustainable energy source.

  3. Help prompt a world war against Russia.

There's 3 off the top of my head. Well done for not thinking for more than 1 second.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

There's something wrong with you if you think the army which is fighting for their country and dignity would blow up their own power plant surrounded by their own cities on their own territory. To hide evidence? What evidence? Ukraine want every single evidence of every single crime exposed to all the world, to maximise prosecutions.

Scare people away from nuclear energy? What on earth? So midway during a war for survival you think the troops are concerned that the world is too sustainable?

No, none of them are good reasons for causing permanent radiological damage to your own country and people. This is evidence of faulty thinking on your part, if you thought that was a serious post you just made

[–]NuclearBadger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Why are you so bigoted?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Dude you seriously wrote that the soldiers defending their homeland might be concerned about too much renewable energy in the world, and choose to create another Chernobyl in their back yard.

Why are you like this?

[–]NuclearBadger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

If they were defending their homeland they wouldn't have fucked off russia by joining nato and attacking russian soil first.

I also didn't say that. I said there's loads of reasons you could want a disaster to happen, because apparently you couldn't think of any.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ah, it's just your make-believe again.

They didn't join NATO, they weren't going to join NATO. Maidan was about the EU, not NATO. And of course Ukraine can join any body they wish to.

Point to where on the map Ukraine attacked the ruzzia first? I think you are referring to the Ukrainian donbass provinces which were invaded by the FSB after maidan.

I also didn't say that

Hey dipshit it's #2 on the list which you wrote and posted above

[–]NuclearBadger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

One of the Kremlin’s top demands near the top of the list: NATO should ban Ukraine from ever joining its alliance.

While NATO, the U.S. and other allies rejected this demand — and have even downplayed the Ukraine-NATO issue as a reason for Russia's invasion — NATO also avoided adding Ukraine despite requests from the country to join over several years.