you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EternalSunset 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Theyre not picking who will run the country. They're talking about who might be suitable. Your portrayal just doesn't make sense. Nuland there is talking about Arseniy Yatseniuk ("Yats") who briefly held power until (checks watch)

"No no no you see. They didn't had any power whatsoever in the matter. They were just having an hypothetical discussion about who they would assign to rule the country in case they were the ones to pick just for the sake of imagination. The fact that the guy they picked in their totally hypothetical scenario would come to rule the country right after that is a pure coincidence."

Man, you propagandists are at least good at making me laugh. xD

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The ultimate decision makers were the Ukrainian voting public...of course the names they were mentioning were connected to power. If Nuland had said the name of a small town shingle roofer and he turned out as prime minister in 2014 then I'd probably agree with you. Any sports team fan might talk about who they think will be in the starting lineup for the big game....doesn't make those fans party to a conspiracy if the big players end up on the field. It just speaks volumes about your smooth folds, that of all possible conclusions a person could have after hearing that phone call, you would so neatly align with the Kremlin's propaganda. Notice how I haven't accused you of being on their payroll - you're just too stupid, sorry. Yet you accuse me of it. I'll take that as a compliment on my intelligence compared to your own