This is a truly devastating loss for the children in Australia...

submitted by Orangutan from i.redd.it

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

Holy fucking shit. I doublepuke.

[–]FediNetizen 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

You reacted to a screenshot of a title. You had no idea if the title was clickbait and if the actual legislation made sense. And frankly, the fact that someone posted a screenshot of a title rather than a link to the actual article should have given you pause.

Maybe next time try to be a little less gullible

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

There was a time, a time before people like YOU got here, where people posted pretty much only stuff that was truthful. But eventually trash came to pollute even here. Sigh.

Anyway, it's not to say I BELIEVE everything shown to me. You're the one who's gullible if you think just because I wrote a one-line comment that I BELIEVE what's written there. Kthxbai.

[–]FediNetizen 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Your "truth" is that "SHADOW ARMED FORCES" are going to start killing US citizens. I'd say it's that you have a problem with falling for things that aren't credible, and now people like me are pointing it out.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

Your every post drips ill faith. I wrote that as a PREDICTION OF THE FUTURE. How dense are you that you can't realize there is no way to disprove such a prediction unless you've been to the time period ascribed to it. And since no date was given, that means ALL OF ETERNITY.

I don't fall for things that aren't credible. Proof: nothing you write gains a single iota of credibility in my mind. Because YOU aren't credible. Your ill faith stinks and I bet so do you physically.

[–]FediNetizen 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I don't fall for things that aren't credible.

Have you forgotten what started this thread already?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Ill faith. I remember it well.

[–]ballooon 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

there is no way to disprove such a prediction unless you've been to the time period ascribed to it

Russel's teapot right there.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Russel's teapot

No. It's a PREDICTION OF THE FUTURE. It doesn't need to be disprovable. No prediction of the future is disprovable.

[–]ballooon 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

By that logic anyone can predict anything, so what's the point?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Here, let me take you by the hand. Go to the title of the sub, and ... here... Click the "mute sub".

That's not so hard, is it?