all 3 comments

[–]Maniak🥃😾 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Those working remotely, other than employees with exceptions such as medical issues or military service, who don’t live close enough to commute to a facility must relocate near an IBM office by the start of August, according to the memo.

[...]

Managers who don’t agree to relocate and are unable to secure a role that’s approved to be remote must “separate from IBM,” Granger wrote.

“IBM is focused on providing a work environment that balances flexibility with the face-to-face interactions that make us more productive, innovative and better able to serve our clients,” a company spokesperson said. “Consistent with that approach, we’re requiring executives and people managers in the United States to be in the office at least three days per week.”

Dipshit executives being dipshits, as usual.

Sure, it's about improving productivity and innovation by having live interactions, because this totally makes sense.

Sure, it has nothing to do with keeping employees under direct supervision and making the monkeys dance to remind them just who's in control of their lives.

[–]RandomCollection[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

https://archive.is/zHt7J

It's clear that IBM is going to be losing a lot of talent in the near future. IBM no longer has the appeal of companies like Google and Apple that people will compete for jobs on. If anything, I've heard from former staff that the wages aren't that good.

[–]sdl5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Google and Apple are hemorrhaging jobs.

As are dozens of other tech type pro remote white collar companies.

Unless you have specific highly needed skills and experience in very particular areas you are not talent. And most MANAGERS at a place like IBM are long past the point of having hands on desired skills.