you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ageingrockstar 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In my view Russell has been unwise, in his segment addressing these allegations/smears, to describe his sexual history as promiscuous but 'always consensual'. They'll now go after him on this point.

[–]Maniak🥃😾[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They'll now go after him on this point.

He included that specifically because that was what they told him they were going after him about. This was an obvious "in the next day or so, a story will be published accusing me of rape", which it was.

The only somewhat weird part about this is that they bothered to warn him beforehand, and gave him time to post something in preparation. It wasn't a segment addressing the allegations but a segment addressing that allegations about "something" was coming. He hasn't posted on his Twitter account since it came, not sure if he appeared publicly anywhere yet or if the response to this is still a work in progress.

It's Russell Fucking Brand. His past has been very public for a long time already. He's been owning it every step of the way.

[–]ageingrockstar 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Consent not being explicit or somewhat ambiguous does not equal sexual assault. However, in a trial by media, it is a good way to hang him. I think Russell has partially fallen into their trap by engaging in any talk about consent (outside a court of law).