all 4 comments

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

At this point most are convinced that the source was the Wuhan Lab in China, and by now, almost three years after the global infections, that point seems uncontroversial.

Like fuck it is. The glaring omission from pieces like this that actually discuss the US bioweapons program is in not even considering the possibility that yes, c19 was a bioweapon, and it was not accidentally released in Wuhan. And the next glaring bit of faulty logic is in thinking USA would outsource their bioweapons development to the same country that is the main target of their bioweapons program, and has been for almost 80 years now.

[–]emorej 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

the scandal: A group of respected scientists lied about their beliefs about the Covid epidemic’s origin, and did so in one of the most respected scientific journals in the country.

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think we all expect them to lie about a covert bioweapons program. Or we should.

[–]emorej 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Indeed, Neuburger (who seems to be trying to gently nudge a readership that he perceives to be instinctively resistant to this line of analysis), says the same thing via rhetorical question as follows:

If you were the military, and decades ago you had “embarked on a program of secret research on biological weapons” (NY Times), why would you not work to influence, finance, and hide your connection to the development of deadly viruses? ...