all 15 comments

[–]3andfro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Vaccine Antibodies Shed In the Breath https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOTPPCL4fiY&ab_channel=DrbeenMedicalLectures (32 mins) - interesting anecdotes in comments

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Vaccine Antibodies Shed In the Breath

Unless those are viable antibodies that can replicate themselves in another human body, that's not enough to call something a transmissible vaccine.

I've always thought that a "transmissible vaccine" would be the gold standard of disease eradication, as long as nothing goes horribly, horribly wrong with it. But then again, if done that way, there would be vastly reduced profits.

[–]3andfro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I thought the study was interesting. Whatever it actually means biologically, it's info that wasn't available to the masses during the high-pressure campaigns to vaccinate the world.

I've always thought that a "transmissible vaccine" would be the gold standard of disease eradication, as long as nothing goes horribly, horribly wrong with it.

Too many people have health issues that contraindicate something. One of the big, shouted-down and mandated away points about the mishandling of the pandemic was the erasure of bodily autonomy: our right to decide for ourselves what we do or don't put in and on the protoplasm that sustains our personhood.

But then again, if done that way, there would be vastly reduced profits.

True, but the least of my concerns with that intriguing concept.

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

On the other hand....

Suppose they did come out with a "transmissible vaccine," one that if you got the shot you could involuntarily pass that alleged disease protection on to dozens, hundreds, thousands of people.

Those that did not want that sort of experimental at-least-semi-living thingy in their bodies would be masking up, "social distancing," and sterilizing everything around them to protect themselves against both the disease and against the "protection" from the disease. Which should, theoretically, reduce transmission rates of the disease itself.

Thus increasing the (later) claimed effectiveness of the "transmissible vaccine."

(If those that came out with a "transmissible vaccine" actually admitted to doing it)

[–]3andfro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You've captured the brilliant perversity of the process, as we've seen it unfold these past 3 years. Orwellian dystopia.

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

On the other other hand...

They don't have to come up with a "transmissible vaccine" to make this happen, they just have to start a rumor that they did, and that they aren't telling anybody that they did.

[–]3andfro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What a nefarious mind you have. I like it. ;D

[–]3andfro 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gillian Keegan, the current Secretary of State for Education, has spent the exam results period repeating the trope that the decision to close schools was difficult but, based on what was then known, inevitable. On Thursday morning, Ms Keegan said that it was difficult to judge in “hindsight” as “people were panicking” and “we have lots more information now”, and “knowing what we know now about the impact on children, of course, we would be very reluctant” to close schools.1

It is simply not true that in 2020 and 2021 the government did not have the information to make an informed decision about school closures. [bold added]

It is neither surprising nor forgivable that Ms Keegan is not across the detail of what the government knew when the decisions (repeatedly) to close schools were made. She is, after all, the sixth Secretary of State since the start of the pandemic.

UsForThem has compiled this primer on the information that, in real-time, was available to the key decision-makers at the time. It draws on a series of detailed special reports on failures of pandemic decision-making that we will be releasing in the Autumn.

A Primer for the Education Secretary: School Closures – the fallacy of the hindsight argument and why Government must stop using it as an excuse for poor decision-making https://usforthem2020.substack.com/p/a-primer-for-the-education-secretary?utm_source

[–]unagisongsBurn down Reddit! 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is just the tip of the iceberg. They've got a trillon dollar pig and they are getting every bit of the meat they can get their hands on.

[–]mzyps 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No.

[–]3andfro 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no

but millions of people hope and pray they live to see consequences for the perpetrators and colluders

[–]kingsmegLiberté, égalité, fraternité 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When have you ever seen someone in power admit they were wrong about anything?

[–]BlackhaloPurity Pony: Pусский бот 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why are they still trying to make Covid a thing?

CDC says COVID variant EG.5 is now dominant, including strain some call "Eris"

It seems risky to me, as it might draw attention to the lies and violations of the past.

[–]InumaGaming Socialist 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Literally just had people die from vaccines in the largest gaming tournament out there.

People blamed one guy getting the Rona on him being fat while the guy that died, no one can talk about how the vaccines killed him.

Everyone is stuck saying Rona causes heart failure and it's repetition of what everyone heard.

No doctor sources and uninformed ignorance.

Useful idiots spread lies serving the empire.

[–]stickdog[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excerpt:

Over the past few years, two immigrants in their mid-fifties became my friends. These guys are among the gentlest spirits that I’ve known, though one tells me he was a boxer back in the day and he works like a beast with a pick and shovel. The other man speaks five languages and knows far more about Botany than I do.

While both men are delightful to interact with, each binge drinks every so often. One drinks until he passes out at the community gardens I manage and sometimes ends up in the hospital, drying out, for multiple days. The other becomes annoyingly loud and manic and does stupid stuff that causes him to lose jobs. He also suffers broken bones in unexplained tumbles. Both have visibly damaged their bodies by drinking excessively and seem likely to die before their time.

When I talk to these two about a given alcohol-fueled episode, they initially deny that they had drank to excess. After I mention the contrary evidence provided by the above outcomes, one admitted that, well, he might have had a beer or two. The other would only cop to imbibing a small amount of an alcohol-based herbal tincture remedy.

Please.

We’ve all seen this same denialism regarding other instances of misbehavior. Initially, the transgressor denies any wrongdoing. Then, when confronted with specific proof, he understates the magnitude and/or frequency of the misconduct. These incomplete, and thus ultimately dishonest, admissions assuage his guilt and allow him to, at least in his own mind, save face and continue his self-deception. Like the child who hides his eyes and thinks you can’t see him because he can’t see you, the self-deceiving misrepresenter thinks he’s also deceiving the listener.

After 41 months, Coronamania exponents find themselves in the same place as unrecovering alcoholics. For nearly three-and-a-half years, they’ve wildly lied about Covid’s danger. In particular, they cited grossly inflated death tolls to build panic and to justify their failed interventions. Nearly all of those said to have died “from Covid” were old, sick and/or obese and would have died soon whether infected or not. Those who didn’t fit this profile likely died iatrogenically from destructive hospital protocols, such as ventilation and kidney-damaging Remdesivir.

Hence, there was never a good reason to limit the lives of the non-old. This virus never justified, e.g., closing schools or mandatorily jabbing hundreds of millions.

Additionally, the Covid overreactors lied about how effective the masks, tests and vaxxes were. When the shots clearly failed—as had been promised—to stop infection and spread, they moved the goalposts to “Well, the shots kept people out of the hospital.”

Yet, neither I, nor many uninjected others, have ever “gotten the virus,” much less been hospitalized. When I say this to vaxxers, they tell me I’m just lucky. It’s certainly not because I masked or hid form people. Because I didn’t.

At long last, many of the Covidmanic are modifying their narrative. David Leonhardt’s recent New York Times article typifies this long overdue acknowledgement and abandonment of some—but not all—of the linchpin Covid lies. For example, 41 months after the racket began, Leonhardt quotes an “expert” who says that Covid deaths correlate closely with old age.

Please.

As if this wasn’t obvious in March, 2020.

In an attempt to self-deceivingly save face and to appear to take a moderate, “nuanced” view, Leonhardt tentatively suggests that “the Pandemic” is over. He says that we should take comfort because, after 41 months of excess mortality, there are scarcely more than average excess deaths.

...