you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]3andfro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Vaccine Antibodies Shed In the Breath https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOTPPCL4fiY&ab_channel=DrbeenMedicalLectures (32 mins) - interesting anecdotes in comments

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Vaccine Antibodies Shed In the Breath

Unless those are viable antibodies that can replicate themselves in another human body, that's not enough to call something a transmissible vaccine.

I've always thought that a "transmissible vaccine" would be the gold standard of disease eradication, as long as nothing goes horribly, horribly wrong with it. But then again, if done that way, there would be vastly reduced profits.

[–]3andfro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I thought the study was interesting. Whatever it actually means biologically, it's info that wasn't available to the masses during the high-pressure campaigns to vaccinate the world.

I've always thought that a "transmissible vaccine" would be the gold standard of disease eradication, as long as nothing goes horribly, horribly wrong with it.

Too many people have health issues that contraindicate something. One of the big, shouted-down and mandated away points about the mishandling of the pandemic was the erasure of bodily autonomy: our right to decide for ourselves what we do or don't put in and on the protoplasm that sustains our personhood.

But then again, if done that way, there would be vastly reduced profits.

True, but the least of my concerns with that intriguing concept.

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

On the other hand....

Suppose they did come out with a "transmissible vaccine," one that if you got the shot you could involuntarily pass that alleged disease protection on to dozens, hundreds, thousands of people.

Those that did not want that sort of experimental at-least-semi-living thingy in their bodies would be masking up, "social distancing," and sterilizing everything around them to protect themselves against both the disease and against the "protection" from the disease. Which should, theoretically, reduce transmission rates of the disease itself.

Thus increasing the (later) claimed effectiveness of the "transmissible vaccine."

(If those that came out with a "transmissible vaccine" actually admitted to doing it)

[–]3andfro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You've captured the brilliant perversity of the process, as we've seen it unfold these past 3 years. Orwellian dystopia.

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

On the other other hand...

They don't have to come up with a "transmissible vaccine" to make this happen, they just have to start a rumor that they did, and that they aren't telling anybody that they did.

[–]3andfro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What a nefarious mind you have. I like it. ;D