Flashback: The Most Predictable Election Fraud Backlash Ever

submitted by arnott from mtracey.medium.com

sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Threadreader archive

Lee Fang's clip of Chris Hayes and Michael Moore criminally conspiring to overthrow the US Government

[–]Shatner_Ghost 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yes -- because Hillary had more votes than Trump and Trump turned out to be "a fan of Russia" invading Ukraine. Also -- he had an impeachment over colluding to stop Ukraine from getting US weapons approved by congress -- so it's pretty clear he was taking a side.

If Hillary was in office, we might not have gotten that important $2 Trillion dollar tax cut so Wall Street could buy back it's stock, or the other $2 Trillion in short term loans so Wall Street could move out of positions before they announced COVID. Or -- maybe we still would have gotten those "punches" against the Deep State by Hillary C. But now we'll never know.

It's not REALLY a coup to suggest electors to change their votes based on their Conscience. They are not REPLACING the Electors and this is part of the process. The whole point of Electors was to not let the rabble (we Americans), vote in another king or a foreign agent of one. Oh well -- I guess the Electors actually made that happen rather than prevented it. The "subversion scheme" you are comparing to Trump's sedition is actually our political process. It's also out in the open -- on a news show.

The Founding Fathers screwed up again! I guess we need to update the Constitution on occasion.

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Oh hey, a slavacocaini in the wild. Cute!

[–]Shatner_Ghost 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Not familiar with the term but I'm guessing you think I endorse Hillary by merely pointing out she had more votes or that you think the LEGAL suggestions to effect the Electors were somehow similar to Trump's ILLEGAL efforts to influence them, or replace them with people who wittingly or not were going to vote as electors for him.

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

merely pointing out she had more votes

This is like losing a game and claiming you somehow won because you ran more yards.

That's not what anyone was trying to do. You want to whine about the rules, whine before the game starts. Don't sign up and whine after the other side wins.

 

the LEGAL suggestions to effect the Electors

Oh, you mean like threatening to shoot them?

 

Trump's ILLEGAL efforts

Here's the thing slugger, you don't get to make the accusation and then pocket it as a fait accompli before the trial. ALL CAPS doesn't make you more convincing. "It's not REALLY a coup!" Oh, okay. I guess Crossfire Hurricane wasn't a thing. The Steele hoax wasn't a thing. Mueller's dozens of wiped phones weren't a thing. Nor was Hillary wandering the earth sniveling to anyone who'd pay her about how she was cheated and Trump was illegitimate and anyway it was all Russia's fault. How about military officers lying to Trump about troop deployments, does that meet your definition of sedition? No wait, I forgot. Your ilk celebrates that.

 

I guess we need to update the Constitution on occasion.

There are two ways to do that. Have at it.

Hint: they're not a pen and a phone.

[–]Shatner_Ghost 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh, you mean like threatening to shoot them?

If anyone in a position of authority endorsed that -- then it would be criminal. I'm sure the FBI follows up on death threats.

Here's the thing slugger, you don't get to make the accusation and then pocket it as a fait accompli before the trial.

Oh -- so you think he's actually going to go to jail? The Mueller report actually reported ten counts of obstruction. And there is AMPLE evidence that he's committed crimes -- there are over 72 indictments. The Trial is to discover the testimony -- you rarely have this much verified evidence before one.

And don't call me "slugger" -- these condescending tactics are annoying.

it was all Russia's fault.

She didn't actually make that claim -- merely pointed out where they were involved and time seems to have proven her correct. There was a hack in Georgia and Reality Winner went to jail for exposing it and the evidence went POOF!

I mean -- it certainly seems like defending Russia and Trump's reputations are far more of a concern around here than Progressives. Who do you even support?

How about military officers lying to Trump about troop deployments,

I have no idea -- first I've heard of that. I think a lot of people started lying to Trump because they didn't want it leaking to other governments. Have you seen his bathroom with the boxes of classified documents yet? Here's kid rock talking about that time Trump turned to him for advice on North Korea; https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/kid-rock-tucker-carlson-interview-1325014/

He probably won't go to jail -- but his own best buddies are laughing about how guilty this guy is and how he knew they were classified. That's just one out of a hundred things. If he was going to jail --- EVERYONE knows he'd fly to Russia. I know they had some good business with Saudi Arabia -- but there's too much money at stake for them -- and they need our weapons, Russia is your sure bet for no economic pressure working.

I mean -- REALLY, you don't know why people stopped telling Trump things? Even though -- I don't know anything about if they did or why, I could just imagine, NOBODY in the right mind would tell this guy anything.

I'm sure he had to fire some people for not telling him about toilet paper on his shoe -- people should have seen the signs at this moment it was all going to fall apart; https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-45758636

There are two ways to do that. Have at it. Hint: they're not a pen and a phone.

Oh, are your tips useful?

[–]MeganDelacroix🤡🌎 detainee 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm sure the FBI follows up on death threats

 

😄

 

time seems to have proven her correct

 

😄

 

I have no idea -- first I've heard of that

 

Here you go.

 

I think a lot of people started lying to Trump because they didn't want it leaking to other governments

 

You seem to be under the misapprehension that the President has a superior. "A lot of people" don't have the right to make that determination, and if you had anything remotely resembling a principle, you'd agree that they should be in prison or hanged.

 

Who do you even support?

 

Never Nazis, and never Democrats. But I repeat myself.

 

there is AMPLE evidence

EVERYONE knows he'd fly to Russia

 

Remember what I said about CAPS LOCK not being an argument?

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is like losing a game and claiming you somehow won because you ran more yards.

In baseball, there have been several teams that lost the World Series while getting more total runs.