you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That one does not appear to be too bright.....

WatB has dwindled from 90,000 subscribers to Saidit's 45 WatB subscribers

<looks at sidebar, sees "19,804 readers"> [Edit, 10 minutes later: 19,805]
I remember seeing, on June 13th of this year, 19,750 "readers" here. (We have archives) Do the math.

They recently claimed to have been a member of "r/WatB" from way back, and the sub ain't what it used to be. And they never saw a Turtle in all that time that they were (allegedly) there.
They offered no proof of this (as ones who make such a claim almost never do.)

[–]bootylicious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Years ago, Saidit recorded every visitor to a sub by referring to that visitor as a 'reader', adding up to 40k readers over the years for some subs. There have been 19,805 individual visitors to WatB since its creation years ago. And as you correctly note, there have been 54 total readers at WatB since 13 June (15 of whom are currently here).

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Saidit recorded every visitor to a sub by referring to that visitor as a 'reader'

If that is going on now, that it is measuring a total of people who have been here.....
How is it that the numbers can go down?

I can think of much better uses for a time machine.....

[–]bootylicious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know

[–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know

Most honest thing you've said in this whole thread.