you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bootylicious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Years ago, Saidit recorded every visitor to a sub by referring to that visitor as a 'reader', adding up to 40k readers over the years for some subs. There have been 19,805 individual visitors to WatB since its creation years ago. And as you correctly note, there have been 54 total readers at WatB since 13 June (15 of whom are currently here).

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]BlackhaloPurity Pony: Pусский бот 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    were

    Were? I'm pretty sure that's a steady-state.

    [–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Continually doubling down on a series of mistaken assertions

    Is it actually "doubling down" or is it "making the pile higher"?

    [–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    https://saidit.net/subs/?count=100&after=t4_3j

    /s/WayOfTheBern: Feel the Bern! 19,805 subscribers, a community for 5 years

    [–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Saidit recorded every visitor to a sub by referring to that visitor as a 'reader'

    If that is going on now, that it is measuring a total of people who have been here.....
    How is it that the numbers can go down?

    I can think of much better uses for a time machine.....

    [–]bootylicious 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I don't know

    [–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I don't know

    Most honest thing you've said in this whole thread.

    [–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Years ago, Saidit recorded every visitor to a sub by referring to that visitor as a 'reader'

    Hmm. That would mean that if I went in through a "private window," Saidit would see me as a "new visitor" and the numbers would go up, right?

    (That is checkable)

    [–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Well. Communication has been breached, which means the block suggested by The Butthurt One was not done.
    Good to know.

    So... how does one get to the actual numbers of people subscribed to a sub?

    and while I'm at it....

    • How many comments were made in all of Saidit in the past 24 hours?
    • How many comments were made in just the subs in s/all in the past 24 hours?
    • How many comments were made in s/WotB in the past 24 hours?

    Also, you mean to tell me that in the past about five years, there have only been fewer than 50,000 people who have even looked at Saidti?? And that almost half of those looked at s/WOTB??

    [–]NetweaselContinuing the struggle 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I did find this:

    https://saidit.net/s/all/comments/ -- 100th most recent comment: 4 hours ago.
    https://saidit.net/s/WayoftheBern/comments/ -- 100th most recent comment: 8 hours ago.
    (if one wishes to verify, use an incognito window -- some subs you are subbed to will be included in the /all list)

    IIRC, WotB's estimated 300 comments/day are not included in s/all's estimated 600 comments/day.