all 6 comments

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What that means is it will be 75 years before any real science can be done with that data. How can you peer review it, how can you see if the results are reproducible if you can't see the data?

Corporate science is not science, but this is not even any kind of science. Until that 75 years are up, how is it different than just marketing claims?

[–]goonmessiah 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

And I will wait 75 years to pay taxes again.

[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

If they are taken to court they will release the info when they are told to.

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The court might agree it is a trade secret. Courts are corrupt like that.

[–]hennaojichan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Especially when the judge gets paid off.😜

[–]Maniak🥃😾[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

(technically it's the text from a picture retweeted by the account, but I'm getting really tired of having to manually type screenshotted links/account names)

(post the screenshot if you're paranoid, but do a fucking copy/paste of the actual link alongside it for fuck's sake)