Study: Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults. tl;dr: the original studies, re-analyzed, show the jabs are NOT safe!

submitted by iamonlyoneman from sciencedirect.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Another look at the data from the manufacturer, another finding of caused harm from the injectable products: https://philharper.substack.com/p/pfizers-own-data-showed-vaccine-creates

He ends with this, which is outstanding:

I expect my critics to say that the difference of 15 between vaccine and placebo isn’t large enough to draw conclusions from. It’s an argument relied on to some extent by the regulators themselves. In which case, which data do you suggest we use to determine the product is safe? This was the study. If the 43,000 sample size isn’t large enough to draw conclusions from, then what is? How large does the safety signal have to be before a study of 43,000 can satisfactorily detect it? This criticism implicitly acknowledges that the study was incapable of detecting a safety signal affecting as many as 1 in 1440 people, which is a disaster. In such a scenario, we cannot use the study to claim the product is safe at all.