all 11 comments

[–]GraviHeel Hortler 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Rapists - "Jackpot!"

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It essentially removes all title 9 provisions. If I say I am a woman I am a woman. If I say I am a man I am a man.

Practically men are gonna be far better at extralegally dealing with problematic women wishing to use the men's room than women will be with men extralegally using the women's room.

I'd almost recommend that women all pack heat, shoot first, then en masse claim that ""she" was coming right for us" almost of course. Since naturally I don't advocate for violence, even if the chances of being legally implicated for such is close to zero. Violence is bad.

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They should just set up a spectator section in the women's locker room if this goes through.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah but I'm not too keen on watching trans women do the helicopter

[–]clownworlddropout 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Love is love!

Oh, and men can use the ladies room.

That's a giant leap for ma'am kind there Joe.

[–]AriShekelsteinDDS 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We have literally reorganized our entire society around the needs of criminals and sexual deviants.

[–]beazer12beard 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The bill prohibits an individual from being denied access to a shared facility, including a restroom, locker room, and a dressing room, that is in accordance with the individual's gender identity.

Ok, we changed the sign on the locker room from "women" to "female"

I identify as female too!

[–]William_World 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

what if biden is secretly based and against title 9 so he is ruining women's sports to teach women a lesson

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He'd be ruining a lot more than women's sports. We're talking PE in school, spas, gyms, women's shelters, and every single public toliet. Gynecologists would have to service trannies too. Every female only space would be open to men who claim to be women. Seems like it would disproportionately affect less affluent women who can't afford to avoid the unwashed masses.

Maybe Biden just hates women, period, unless they're underage and he's smelling or showering with them.

[–]William_World 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

what if it's worth it

[–]UncleWillard56 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But not abortion. Remember that ladies and feminists, the dems have had multiple presidencies and even a super majority during Obama's administration to codify RvW and they didn't. Now they're trying to protect trans rights...a tiny percent of the population and for no reason but to get votes. They don't care about you and never will.