FtM sub on shooter "We're screwed"!

submitted by jacques1102 from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Yeah she's a right cunt. She said "murder" as a solution to what to do about pro life activists. Call her a right cunt for that.

She didn't say "go kill elementary school kids".

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Why does this read like you're playing defense for Jane Fonda?

If wealthy celebrities want help online, they'll hire some. Don't be a sucker. Why would anyone work like this for free?

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Because she said to murder anti-abortion activists. She didn't say to murder 9 year old children.

Let the cunt spin her own rope. We don't need to make it for her.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Defending Hanoi Jane. Super sus.

I'm almost getting the idea that this is yet another paid poster account, here to disrupt our conversations on this site.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's bad enough watching the left base entire arguments on things that nobody actually said. So when someone makes an effort to avoid falling into that same trap by accurately presenting an inciting statement, in context, can you maybe not be a stereotypical NPC and start with your "must be a paid shill" scripted response? I know it's a challenge, but I'm confident you can manage it if you really try.

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

95% are paid shills here so it's always a safe bet tho. I think that might be a main reason for shilling tho, so we can't trust each other.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not sure how you read in a "defense of Jane Fonda" into comments like "she's a right cunt" "let her spin her own rope" "what she said is pretty indefensible".

It's either a bad faith effort at starting a stupid argument when you have none of your own, or it's just pure stupidity.

I believe it's always a good idea to assume good faith.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've come to realize that the site's motto is more accurately rendered thusly: Saidit - Say your truth (but if we think you're a paid actor, defending (((them))), or otherwise a potential competitor to our truth, we'll try to deplatform you like a pack of Reddit mods).