FtM sub on shooter "We're screwed"!

submitted by jacques1102 from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's bad enough watching the left base entire arguments on things that nobody actually said. So when someone makes an effort to avoid falling into that same trap by accurately presenting an inciting statement, in context, can you maybe not be a stereotypical NPC and start with your "must be a paid shill" scripted response? I know it's a challenge, but I'm confident you can manage it if you really try.

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

95% are paid shills here so it's always a safe bet tho. I think that might be a main reason for shilling tho, so we can't trust each other.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not sure how you read in a "defense of Jane Fonda" into comments like "she's a right cunt" "let her spin her own rope" "what she said is pretty indefensible".

It's either a bad faith effort at starting a stupid argument when you have none of your own, or it's just pure stupidity.

I believe it's always a good idea to assume good faith.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've come to realize that the site's motto is more accurately rendered thusly: Saidit - Say your truth (but if we think you're a paid actor, defending (((them))), or otherwise a potential competitor to our truth, we'll try to deplatform you like a pack of Reddit mods).