FtM sub on shooter "We're screwed"!

submitted by jacques1102 from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Why does this read like you're playing defense for Jane Fonda?

If wealthy celebrities want help online, they'll hire some. Don't be a sucker. Why would anyone work like this for free?

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Because she said to murder anti-abortion activists. She didn't say to murder 9 year old children.

Let the cunt spin her own rope. We don't need to make it for her.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Defending Hanoi Jane. Super sus.

I'm almost getting the idea that this is yet another paid poster account, here to disrupt our conversations on this site.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's bad enough watching the left base entire arguments on things that nobody actually said. So when someone makes an effort to avoid falling into that same trap by accurately presenting an inciting statement, in context, can you maybe not be a stereotypical NPC and start with your "must be a paid shill" scripted response? I know it's a challenge, but I'm confident you can manage it if you really try.

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

95% are paid shills here so it's always a safe bet tho. I think that might be a main reason for shilling tho, so we can't trust each other.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not sure how you read in a "defense of Jane Fonda" into comments like "she's a right cunt" "let her spin her own rope" "what she said is pretty indefensible".

It's either a bad faith effort at starting a stupid argument when you have none of your own, or it's just pure stupidity.

I believe it's always a good idea to assume good faith.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've come to realize that the site's motto is more accurately rendered thusly: Saidit - Say your truth (but if we think you're a paid actor, defending (((them))), or otherwise a potential competitor to our truth, we'll try to deplatform you like a pack of Reddit mods).

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She said:

Fonda told the panel: "We have experienced many decades now of having agency over our body of being able to determine when and how many children we have... We know what that's done for our lives. We're not going back. I don't care what the laws are. We're not going back to this."

Fonda was also asked what other alternatives there were to protesting the ruling in the streets. The resurfaced video of her appearance on The View was published to Twitter and has had more than 20 million views.

"Well, I've thought of murder," Fonda told co-host Joy Behar, who said that it was a joke.

Now I think this could mean she thinks killing the children of pro life activists is ok, because it might send a message. Either way she didn't say who to murder. This is why one should be careful with words.