use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~6 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
DJ Diplo says he's had oral sex from a man and claims it's 'not that gay'
submitted 1 year ago by [deleted] from dailystar.co.uk
view the rest of the comments →
[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
That only applies during threeseomes with a woman. Direct dude-on-dude always needs the "no homo" clause invoked ASAP.
[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
While the "balls don't touch" rule applies to threesomes with a woman, the "both had socks on" can also happen for dude-on-dude.
There's also questions of level- like, if it's with a sibling does "no chromo" or "no homo" trump it. What if it's a underage sibling, and you have to add "no chomo" to the mix as well?
[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
I believe that, in the case of siblings, the "Roll Tide" rule supersedes everything else. And once that rule in invoked, you never go back to a lesser rule.
[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
And for the last part...you're at the glory hole. You've got your dick inside. You don't KNOW it's a man on the other end, and all you feel is the mouth or the ass. You could be fucking a woman's ass, a woman's mouth, or sucking a ladydick there. That's clearly not a "no homo" situation, correct?
[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Glory holes are well beyond the scope of "no homo" coverage, which is meant primarily to be applied to cases of casual or incidental dude-on-dude activity.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun - (4 children)
[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)