TRANSGENDERIt’s happening! Journal article suggests that if we allow transgenderism, there’s no logical argument against transablism, transpeciesm..Otherkin are logically consistent with trans ideology!

submitted by ClassroomPast6178 from journalofcontroversialideas.org

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 8 insightful - 9 fun8 insightful - 8 fun9 insightful - 9 fun -  (1 child)

Abstract: Rebecca Tuvel provoked a firestorm by arguing that since we should accept trans* self-identification, we should accept transracial identification as well. This paper defends Tuvel’s conditional claim (if trans* acceptance, then transracial acceptance) but draws a different conclusion. I argue that reasoning similar to Tuvel’s establishes that people who identify as something other than human, and people who identify as physically disabled though their bodies aren’t impaired, plausibly also deserve recognition. This reductio ad absurdum of her reasoning should lead us to doubt whether we must embrace trans* self-identification as fully as self-described trans* allies claim that we must.

Otherkin: Follow the science, bitches!

[–]FlyingKangaroo 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unironically, there’s a lots of otherkin people who would claim science supports their cause. Just like trans does it.